AIMS: ECVUE™ technology, a novel, three-dimensional, non-invasive mapping system, offers a unique arrhythmia characterization and localization. We sought to evaluate the clinical impact of this system in routine clinical mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients with monomorphic premature ventricular contractions with or without monomorphic ventricular tachycardia were enrolled prospectively and randomized into two groups: ventricular ectopy localization using either 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) algorithms or with ECVUE™, followed by conventional guided ablation. Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study. The ECVUE™ system accurately identified both the chamber and sub-localized the VA origin in 20 of 21 (95.2%) patients. In contrast, using 12-lead ECG algorithms, the chamber was accurately diagnosed in 16 of 21 (76.2%) patients, while the arrhythmia origin in only 8 of 21 (38.1%), (P = 0.001 vs. ECVUE™). Acute success in ablation was achieved in all patients. Regarding the number of radiofrequency-energy applications (in total 2 vs. 4, P = 0.005) in the ECVUE™ arm, ablation was more precise than the ECG group which used standard of care activation and pace mapping-guided ablation. Three months success in ablation was 95.2% for the ECVUE™ and 100% for the ECG group (P = ns). Time to ablation was 35.3 min in the conventional arm and 24.4 min in ECVUE Group, (P = 0.035). The X-ray radiation exposure was 3.21 vs. 0.39 mSv, P = 0.001 for the ECVUE™ group and ECG group. CONCLUSION:ECVUE™ technology offers a clinically useful tool to map VAs with high accuracy and more targeted ablations superior to the body surface ECG but had significantly higher radiation exposure due to computed tomography scan. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: ECVUE™ technology, a novel, three-dimensional, non-invasive mapping system, offers a unique arrhythmia characterization and localization. We sought to evaluate the clinical impact of this system in routine clinical mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients with monomorphic premature ventricular contractions with or without monomorphic ventricular tachycardia were enrolled prospectively and randomized into two groups: ventricular ectopy localization using either 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) algorithms or with ECVUE™, followed by conventional guided ablation. Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study. The ECVUE™ system accurately identified both the chamber and sub-localized the VA origin in 20 of 21 (95.2%) patients. In contrast, using 12-lead ECG algorithms, the chamber was accurately diagnosed in 16 of 21 (76.2%) patients, while the arrhythmia origin in only 8 of 21 (38.1%), (P = 0.001 vs. ECVUE™). Acute success in ablation was achieved in all patients. Regarding the number of radiofrequency-energy applications (in total 2 vs. 4, P = 0.005) in the ECVUE™ arm, ablation was more precise than the ECG group which used standard of care activation and pace mapping-guided ablation. Three months success in ablation was 95.2% for the ECVUE™ and 100% for the ECG group (P = ns). Time to ablation was 35.3 min in the conventional arm and 24.4 min in ECVUE Group, (P = 0.035). The X-ray radiation exposure was 3.21 vs. 0.39 mSv, P = 0.001 for the ECVUE™ group and ECG group. CONCLUSION: ECVUE™ technology offers a clinically useful tool to map VAs with high accuracy and more targeted ablations superior to the body surface ECG but had significantly higher radiation exposure due to computed tomography scan. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Pranav Bhagirath; Maurits van der Graaf; Elise van Dongen; Jacques de Hooge; Vincent van Driel; Hemanth Ramanna; Natasja de Groot; Marco J W Götte Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Matthijs J M Cluitmans; Michael Clerx; Nele Vandersickel; Ralf L M Peeters; Paul G A Volders; Ronald L Westra Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Erik Wissner; Ardan M Saguner; Andreas Metzner; Mikhail Chmelesky; Alexey Tsyganov; Sebastian Deiss; Tilman Maurer; Karl-Heinz Kuck Journal: HeartRhythm Case Rep Date: 2016-02-23
Authors: A W Maurits van der Graaf; Pranav Bhagirath; Jacques de Hooge; Hemanth Ramanna; Vincent J H M van Driel; Natasja M S de Groot; Marco J W Götte Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 1.900