Literature DB >> 25348895

Fake Journals: Not Always Valid Ways to Distinguish Them.

Khaled Moustafa1.   

Abstract

In their recent paper, Esfe et al. (Sci Eng Ethics, doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9595-z 2014) present some criteria for fake journals and propose some 'features' to recognize them. While I share most of the authors' concerns about this issue in general, some of the reported criteria are not fit to differentiate fake journals from genuine ones. Here are some examples derived from their list, which illustrate that such criteria are not necessarily specific to fake journals only, but they could also apply to well-established journals and, therefore, should not be considered as is.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common science pitfall; Fair publication system; Fake journals; Open access; Publication frenzy; Publishing bias; Research misconduct

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25348895     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9608-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  1 in total

1.  Fake Journals: Their Features and Some Viable Ways to Distinguishing Them.

Authors:  Mohammad Hemmat Esfe; Somchai Wongwises; Amin Asadi; Mohammad Akbari
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Online-Based Approaches to Identify Real Journals and Publishers from Hijacked Ones.

Authors:  Amin Asadi; Nader Rahbar; Meisam Asadi; Fahime Asadi; Kokab Khalili Paji
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Fake/Bogus Conferences: Their Features and Some Subtle Ways to Differentiate Them from Real Ones.

Authors:  Amin Asadi; Nader Rahbar; Mohammad Javad Rezvani; Fahime Asadi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.525

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.