Literature DB >> 25348544

A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures.

S R Bryant1, J N Walton2, M I MacEntee2.   

Abstract

The hypothesis of this 5-y randomized clinical trial was that there would be no significant difference in the satisfaction of edentulous participants with removable complete overdentures attached to 1 or 2 mandibular implants. Secondary aims were to test changes in satisfaction between and within the groups from baseline to 5 y and differences between the groups in implant survival and prosthodontic maintenance over 5 y. Each of the 86 participants (mean age, 67 y) was randomly allocated to receive either 1 implant in the midline (group 1) or 2 implants in the canine areas (group 2) attached to a mandibular overdenture opposing a maxillary complete denture. Satisfaction was self-assessed by participants on a visual analog scale at baseline prior to implants, as well as at 2 mo and 1, 3, and 5 y with implant overdentures, whereas implant survival and prosthodontic maintenance were assessed by clinical examination. After 5 y, 29 participants in group 1 and 33 in group 2 were available, with most dropouts due to death. Satisfaction with the implant denture after 5 y was significantly (P < 0.001) higher than at baseline in both groups and remained with no significant difference (P = 0.32) between the groups. No implants failed in group 1 but 5 failed before loading in 4 participants in group 2. Most participants required maintenance or occasionally denture replacement, and although differences between the groups were not statistically significant, group 1 experienced almost twice as many fractured dentures usually adjacent to the implant attachment. We conclude that there were no significant differences after 5 y in satisfaction or survival of implants with mandibular overdentures retained by 1 implant or 2 implants. Additional research is required to confirm long-term treatment effectiveness of single-implant dentures and the implications of prosthetic maintenance with implant overdentures (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02117856). © International & American Associations for Dental Research 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complete denture; dental implant; edentulous mandible; implant-supported dental prosthesis; single-implant denture; standard of care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25348544     DOI: 10.1177/0022034514554224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  15 in total

1.  Stabilizing mandibular complete dentures by a single midline implant-influence on quality of life: 2-year results from a randomized clinical trial comparing different loading protocols.

Authors:  Samir Abou-Ayash; Nadine von Maltzahn; Nicole Passia; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Daniel R Reissmann; Ralph G Luthardt; Torsten Mundt; Michael Raedel; Peter Rammelsberg; Stefan Wolfart; Matthias Kern
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Pain and discomfort following immediate and delayed loading by overdentures in the single mandibular implant study (SMIS).

Authors:  T Mundt; N Passia; W Att; G Heydecke; S Freitag-Wolf; R G Luthardt; S Kappel; I K Konstantinidis; M Stiesch; S Wolfart; M Kern
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of ridge resorption and patient satisfaction in single implant-supported mandibular overdentures with conventional complete dentures: A randomised pilot study.

Authors:  Subin Km; Dheeraj Kumar Koli; Veena Jain; Gunjan Pruthi; Aditi Nanda
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-11-25

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of the single-implant mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Túlio Eduardo Nogueira; Shahrokh Esfandiari; Cláudio Rodrigues Leles
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Single-implant overdentures retained by the Novaloc attachment system: study protocol for a mixed-methods randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Raphael F de Souza; Christophe Bedos; Shahrokh Esfandiari; Nicholas M Makhoul; Didem Dagdeviren; Samer Abi Nader; Areej A Jabbar; Jocelyne S Feine
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Survival and Complications of Single Dental Implants in the Edentulous Mandible Following Immediate or Delayed Loading: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  M Kern; W Att; E Fritzer; S Kappel; R G Luthardt; T Mundt; D R Reissmann; M Rädel; M Stiesch; S Wolfart; N Passia
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws.

Authors:  Alan Gt Payne; Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha; Momen A Atieh; Marco Esposito; Sunyoung Ma; Marwah Anas El-Wegoud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-11

Review 8.  Some issues related to evidence-based implantology.

Authors:  Gunnar E Carlsson
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

9.  The patient general satisfaction of mandibular single-implant overdentures and conventional complete dentures: Study protocol for a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Manabu Kanazawa; Mariko Tanoue; Anna Miyayasu; Shin Takeshita; Daisuke Sato; Mari Asami; Thuy Vo Lam; Khaing Myat Thu; Ken Oda; Yuriko Komagamine; Shunsuke Minakuchi; Jocelyne Feine
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants.

Authors:  André Gustavo Paleari; Norberto Martins de Oliveira Junior; Danny Omar Mendoza Marin; Larissa Santana Rodriguez; João Neudenir Arioli Filho; Ana Carolina Pero; Marco Antonio Compagnoni
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.