| Literature DB >> 25348169 |
Maarten Albersen1, Rufus Cartwright2, Peter Choyke3, S Larry Goldenberg4, Howard Goldman5, Nathan Lawrentschuk6, W Marston Linehan7, Declan Murphy8, Harris Nagler9, Peter Scardino10, Linda Shortliffe11, Arnulf Stenzl12, Dan Theodorescu13.
Abstract
When Nature Reviews Urology launched in 2004, the field of urology was vastly different to that which we work in today, and the past 10 years have seen the field change immensely. As a specialty on the forefront of cutting-edge innovation, urologists are often the first to embrace new technologies and ideas. In this Viewpoint, members of the Nature Reviews Urology advisory board were asked what they thought was the most important change, issue or innovation in urology in the past 10 years, and what they expected to be the most important in the next decade. Here are their opinions.Entities:
Mesh：
Substances：
Year: 2014 PMID： 25348169 DOI： 10.1038/nrurol.2014.263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Rev Urol ISSN： 1759-4812 Impact factor: 14.432