Literature DB >> 25348137

Correlation of computed tomography angiography parameters and shock index to assess the transportation risk in aortic dissection patients.

Zhi-Jun Guo1, Qiang Lin, Xue-Rong Zi, Qian Xu, Hai-Tao Liu, Jun-Ying Lu, Hong-Wei Chi, Jian-Xin Wang, Bin Cao, Bao-Hong Zhao, Yu-Huan Zhang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aortic dissection (AD) is a serious, life-threatening disease. It is currently crucial for AD patients to be transferred to a specialised hospital in a safe and timely manner. For this reason, the search for clinical and imaging changes related to transportation risk is becoming increasingly important.
PURPOSE: The transportation risks of AD patients were assessed by studying the correlation between computed tomography angiography (CTA) parameters and shock index.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six cases of AD confirmed with 64-slice volumetric CT (VCT) (18 cases of Stanford type A and 18 cases of type B) were divided into a high-risk group (14 cases, six Stanford type A and eight type B) and a low-risk group (22 cases, 12 Stanford type A and 10 type B) according to the modified Early Warning Score. The shock index (ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure) and measured CTA parameters were compared between the high-risk group and the low-risk group, and the correlation between the measured CTA parameters and shock index was analysed.
RESULTS: The shock index and ratio of false/true lumen were compared between Stanford type A and type B, and no statistically significant differences were found. The shock index and ratio of false/true lumen were compared between the high-risk group and low-risk group, revealing a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Moreover, a significant linear correlation was found between the ratio of false/true lumen and the shock index (r = 0.691; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The higher the shock index and the ratio of false/true lumen are, the greater the transportation risk for AD patients. The shock index and the ratio of false/true lumen proved to be essential clinical and radiological indices for assessing the transportation risk of AD patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25348137     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-014-0463-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  19 in total

1.  Aortic dissection: CT features that distinguish true lumen from false lumen.

Authors:  M A LePage; L E Quint; S S Sonnad; G M Deeb; D M Williams
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Acute aortic dissection: perspectives from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD).

Authors:  T T Tsai; S Trimarchi; C A Nienaber
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 7.069

3.  Predicting the risk for acute type B aortic dissection in hypertensive patients using anatomic variables.

Authors:  Aditya S Shirali; Moritz S Bischoff; Hung-Mo Lin; Irina Oyfe; Robert Lookstein; Randall B Griepp; Gabriele Di Luozzo
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-02-20

4.  [Successful prehospital diagnosis secures fast and correct treatment of acute aorta dissection].

Authors:  Susanne Hylleberg; Kim Allan Terp; Jens Flensted Lassen; Poul Lenler-Petersen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2013-01-21

5.  Dissecting aneurysm of the descending aorta. Improved surgical results in 91 patients.

Authors:  G J Reul; D A Cooley; G L Hallman; S B Reddy; E R Kyger; D C Wukasch
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1975-05

6.  Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: increasing prevalence and improved outcomes reported in a nationwide population-based study of more than 14,000 cases from 1987 to 2002.

Authors:  Christian Olsson; Stefan Thelin; Elisabeth Ståhle; Anders Ekbom; Fredrik Granath
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Aortic dissection and malperfusion syndrome: a when, what and how-to guide.

Authors:  M Midulla; R Fattori; J-P Beregi; M Dake; H Rousseau
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  MDCT in diagnosing acute aortic syndromes: reviewing common and less common CT findings.

Authors:  T Valente; G Rossi; F Lassandro; M Marino; G Tortora; R Muto; M Scaglione
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients.

Authors:  Chad M Cannon; Carla C Braxton; Mendy Kling-Smith; Jonathan D Mahnken; Elizabeth Carlton; Michael Moncure
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-12

10.  Optimising fast track care for proximal femoral fracture patients using modified early warning score.

Authors:  B Ollivere; K Rollins; R Brankin; M Wood; T J Brammar; J Wimhurst
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  1 in total

1.  The use of the shock index to predict hemodynamic collapse in hypotensive sepsis patients: A cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Zohair Al Aseri; Mohammed Al Ageel; Mohammed Binkharfi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2020-03-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.