Literature DB >> 25347682

Workout at work: laboratory test of psychological and performance outcomes of active workstations.

Michael Sliter1, Zhenyu Yuan1.   

Abstract

With growing concerns over the obesity epidemic in the United States and other developed countries, many organizations have taken steps to incorporate healthy workplace practices. However, most workers are still sedentary throughout the day--a major contributor to individual weight gain. The current study sought to gather preliminary evidence of the efficacy of active workstations, which are a possible intervention that could increase employees' physical activity while they are working. We conducted an experimental study, in which boredom, task satisfaction, stress, arousal, and performance were evaluated and compared across 4 randomly assigned conditions: seated workstation, standing workstation, cycling workstation, and walking workstation. Additionally, body mass index (BMI) and exercise habits were examined as moderators to determine whether differences in these variables would relate to increased benefits in active conditions. The results (n = 180) showed general support for the benefits of walking workstations, whereby participants in the walking condition had higher satisfaction and arousal and experienced less boredom and stress than those in the passive conditions. Cycling workstations, on the other hand, tended to relate to reduced satisfaction and performance when compared with other conditions. The moderators did not impact these relationships, indicating that walking workstations might have psychological benefits to individuals, regardless of BMI and exercise habits. The results of this study are a preliminary step in understanding the work implications of active workstations. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25347682     DOI: 10.1037/a0038175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol        ISSN: 1076-8998


  8 in total

1.  Activity Workstations in High Schools: Decreasing Sedentary Behavior Without Negatively Impacting Schoolwork.

Authors:  June J Pilcher; Timothy L Hulett; Paige S Harrill; Jessie M Cashman; G Lawson Hamilton; Eva Diaz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  The Effects of Walking Workstations on Biomechanical Performance.

Authors:  Daniel M Grindle; Lauren Baker; Mike Furr; Tim Puterio; Brian Knarr; Jill Higginson
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 1.833

3.  Work engagement and its association with occupational sitting time: results from the Stormont study.

Authors:  Fehmidah Munir; Jonathan Houdmont; Stacy Clemes; Kelly Wilson; Robert Kerr; Ken Addley
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  The Impact of Active Workstations on Workplace Productivity and Performance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samson O Ojo; Daniel P Bailey; Angel M Chater; David J Hewson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Introducing a Dynamic Workstation in the Office: Insights in Characteristics of Use and Short-Term Changes of Well-Being in a 12 Week Observational Study.

Authors:  Vera Schellewald; Jens Kleinert; Rolf Ellegast
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Does treadmill workstation use affect user's kinematic gait symmetry?

Authors:  Paul Gonzalo Arauz; María-Gabriela García; Mauricio Velez; Cesar León; Francisco Velez; Bernard Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Task Performance and Meta-Cognitive Outcomes When Using Activity Workstations and Traditional Desks.

Authors:  June J Pilcher; Victoria C Baker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-21

8.  Implementation of Active Workstations in University Libraries-A Comparison of Portable Pedal Exercise Machines and Standing Desks.

Authors:  Camille Bastien Tardif; Maude Cantin; Sylvain Sénécal; Pierre-Majorique Léger; Élise Labonté-Lemoyne; Mickael Begon; Marie-Eve Mathieu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.