Literature DB >> 25347093

Role of SUVmax and GLUT-1 Expression in Determining Tumor Aggressiveness in Patients With Clinical Stage I Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer.

Dong Wook Lee1, Gun Oh Chong, Yoon Hee Lee, Dae Gy Hong, Young Lae Cho, Shin Young Jeong, Ji Young Park, Yoon Soon Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in estimating tumor aggressiveness in patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer and the correlation between aggressiveness and expression of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1).
METHODS: F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed on 43 patients with clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake was quantified by calculating the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) and GLUT-1 expression status based on immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) SUV(max) of the primary tumor was 8.55 (5.04). The mean SUV(max) and GLUT-1 expression in stage IB and stage IC were significantly higher than that in stage IA (P = 0.001; P = 0.003). The mean (SD) SUV(max) was 6.81 (4.55) in grade 1, 10.92 (4.61) in grade 2, and 15.35 (1.34) in grade 3 (grade 1 vs grade 2 and 3; P = 0.005). The mean (SD) GLUT-1 expression was 1.17 (0.94) in grade 1, 2.00 (0.94) in grade 2, and 3.00 (0.00) in grade 3 (grade 1 vs grade 2 and 3; P = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor aggressiveness, such as myometrial invasion or tumor grade, had a positive correlation with the SUV(max) and GLUT-1 expression in patients with clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25347093     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

1.  Prognostic value of lymph node-to-primary tumor standardized uptake value ratio in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Gi Jeong Cheon; Jae-Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Stereotactic Comparison Study of (18)F-Alfatide and (18)F-FDG PET Imaging in an LLC Tumor-Bearing C57BL/6 Mouse Model.

Authors:  Yu-Chun Wei; Yongsheng Gao; Jianbo Zhang; Zheng Fu; Jinsong Zheng; Ning Liu; Xudong Hu; Wenhong Hou; Jinming Yu; Shuanghu Yuan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Associations between GLUT expression and SUV values derived from FDG-PET in different tumors-A systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Hans-Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke; Alexey Surov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Glucose transporters: Important regulators of endometrial cancer therapy sensitivity.

Authors:  Xing Zhang; Jia-Jing Lu; Ayitila Abudukeyoumu; Ding-Yu Hou; Jing Dong; Jiang-Nan Wu; Li-Bing Liu; Ming-Qing Li; Feng Xie
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Comparison of the Prognostic Value of F-18 Pet Metabolic Parameters of Primary Tumors and Regional Lymph Nodes in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Who Are Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Gun Oh Chong; Shin Young Jeong; Shin-Hyung Park; Yoon Hee Lee; Sang-Woo Lee; Dae Gy Hong; Jae-Chul Kim; Yoon Soon Lee; Young Lae Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Evrim Erdemoğlu; Sevim Süreyya Çerçi; Ebru Erdemoğlu; Yakup Yalçın; Burak Tatar
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.