Joao A Paulo1, Vivek Kadiyala2, Scott Brizard2, Peter A Banks2, Darwin L Conwell2, Hanno Steen3. 1. Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA. Proteomics Center at Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA. Center for Pancreatic Disease, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 2. Center for Pancreatic Disease, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 3. Departments of Pathology, Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Proteomics Center at Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is currently diagnosed using invasive endoscopic as well as radiation and non-radiation-based imaging techniques. However, urine can be safely and non-invasively collected and as such may offer a superior alternative to current techniques of CP diagnosis. We use mass spectrometry-based methods to discover proteins which are exclusive to or differentially abundant in urine of chronic pancreatitis patients. METHODS: We have performed a comparative quantitative proteomic analysis of urine collected from 5 healthy controls and 5 severe CP patients. Proteins from urine were fractionated briefly on SDS-PAGE and subsequently digested in-gel with trypsin. The resulting peptides were fractionated for 3 hours by reversed-phase liquid chromatography in-line with a mass spectrometer. ProteinPilot software and the QSPEC algorithm identified proteins and determined statistically significant differences between cohorts. In addition, we used a third cohort of non-CP disease patients to filter out those proteins which may be indicative of an ailment other than CP. RESULTS: We identified over 600 proteins from urine, of which several hundred were either exclusive to or differ quantitatively between healthy controls and severe CP patients. Members of the cathepsin protein family were of significantly higher abundance in the severe CP cohort. In addition, we have identified a core set of 50 proteins in all 15 samples, 25 of which showed no significant difference among the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Proteomic analysis identified differentially abundant proteins in healthy controls and severe CP patients. Such proteins represent an initial set of targets for directed proteomics experiments for further validation studies. However, larger cohorts will be required to determine if these differences have statistically significant diagnostic potential.
BACKGROUND:Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is currently diagnosed using invasive endoscopic as well as radiation and non-radiation-based imaging techniques. However, urine can be safely and non-invasively collected and as such may offer a superior alternative to current techniques of CP diagnosis. We use mass spectrometry-based methods to discover proteins which are exclusive to or differentially abundant in urine of chronic pancreatitispatients. METHODS: We have performed a comparative quantitative proteomic analysis of urine collected from 5 healthy controls and 5 severe CP patients. Proteins from urine were fractionated briefly on SDS-PAGE and subsequently digested in-gel with trypsin. The resulting peptides were fractionated for 3 hours by reversed-phase liquid chromatography in-line with a mass spectrometer. ProteinPilot software and the QSPEC algorithm identified proteins and determined statistically significant differences between cohorts. In addition, we used a third cohort of non-CP diseasepatients to filter out those proteins which may be indicative of an ailment other than CP. RESULTS: We identified over 600 proteins from urine, of which several hundred were either exclusive to or differ quantitatively between healthy controls and severe CP patients. Members of the cathepsin protein family were of significantly higher abundance in the severe CP cohort. In addition, we have identified a core set of 50 proteins in all 15 samples, 25 of which showed no significant difference among the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Proteomic analysis identified differentially abundant proteins in healthy controls and severe CP patients. Such proteins represent an initial set of targets for directed proteomics experiments for further validation studies. However, larger cohorts will be required to determine if these differences have statistically significant diagnostic potential.
Authors: Meng-Qiu Dong; John D Venable; Nora Au; Tao Xu; Sung Kyu Park; Daniel Cociorva; Jeffrey R Johnson; Andrew Dillin; John R Yates Journal: Science Date: 2007-08-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Ignat V Shilov; Sean L Seymour; Alpesh A Patel; Alex Loboda; Wilfred H Tang; Sean P Keating; Christie L Hunter; Lydia M Nuwaysir; Daniel A Schaeffer Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2007-05-27 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Joao A Paulo; Linda S Lee; Bechien Wu; Peter A Banks; Hanno Steen; Darwin L Conwell Journal: Proteomics Clin Appl Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Rembert Pieper; Christine L Gatlin; Andrew M McGrath; Anthony J Makusky; Madhu Mondal; Michael Seonarain; Erin Field; Courtney R Schatz; Marla A Estock; Nasir Ahmed; Norman G Anderson; Sandra Steiner Journal: Proteomics Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate; Kristyn Gumpper; Valentina Pita; Phil A Hart; Christopher Forsmark; David C Whitcomb; Dhiraj Yadav; Richard T Waldron; Stephen Pandol; Hanno Steen; Vincent Anani; Natasha Kanwar; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Savi Appana; Liang Li; Jose Serrano; Jo Ann S Rinaudo; Mark Topazian; Darwin L Conwell Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.996