| Literature DB >> 25346735 |
Jovany Cruz Navarro1, Shibu Pillai1, Lucido L Ponce1, Mai Van1, Jerry Clay Goodman2, Claudia S Robertson1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin (Epo) improves post-traumatic cerebral blood flow (CBF), pressure autoregulation, and vascular reactivity to l-arginine. This study examines the dependence of these cerebral hemodynamic effects of Epo on nitric oxide generated by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS).Entities:
Keywords: cerebral blood flow; erythropoietin; neuroprotection; nitric oxide; nitric oxide synthase; traumatic brain injury
Year: 2014 PMID: 25346735 PMCID: PMC4191322 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Hemodynamic response to the controlled cortical impact (first arrow) followed by administration of the assigned treatment (second arrow). (A) Mean arterial pressure (MAP) changes during the experiment. The animals that were deficient in eNOS had a higher pre-injury MAP and had a greater drop in MAP after injury than the wild-type animals. When the group × time interaction was significant, symbols indicate which treatments were significantly different among the treatments’ groups by the Holm-Sidak post hoc test. (B–D) Cerebral blood flow response measured by laser Doppler in the core (B), contra-lateral (C) and peri-contusional (D) cerebral cortex. The core had a severe persistent drop in CBF regardless of the animal genotype or treatment group. The contra-lateral cortex showed a small to no decline followed by increased perfusion in all groups. In the peri-contusional regions, Epo treatment effect was seen in the WT animals but not in the eNOS-deficient animals (N = 14 per group).
Multi-level statistical model for the cerebral blood flow (CBF) data comparing the EPO-treated and the saline-treated groups in the two genotypes of mice.
| Effect | Core | Peri-contusional | Contra-lateral | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDF | DDF | F-value | NDF | DDF | F-value | p | NDF | DDF | F-value | |||
| Cerebral blood flow | ||||||||||||
| Treatment | 1 | 52 | 0.7 | 0.4056 | 1 | 52 | 5.29 | 0.0255 | 1 | 52 | 2.77 | 0.1023 |
| Genotype | 1 | 52 | 0.92 | 0.3418 | 1 | 52 | 7.35 | 0.0091 | 1 | 52 | 2.13 | 0.1508 |
| Treatment*genotype | 1 | 52 | 0.65 | 0.4248 | 1 | 52 | 8.00 | 0.0066 | 1 | 52 | 0.08 | 0.7832 |
| Time | 5 | 260 | 80.59 | <0.0001 | 5 | 260 | 39.26 | <0.0001 | 5 | 260 | 10.22 | <0.0001 |
| Time*treatment | 5 | 260 | 0.19 | 0.9652 | 5 | 260 | 1.09 | 0.3684 | 5 | 260 | 0.39 | 0.8548 |
| Time*genotype | 5 | 260 | 0.99 | 0.4221 | 5 | 260 | 6.91 | <0.0001 | 5 | 260 | 1.32 | 0.2572 |
| Time*treatment*genotype | 5 | 260 | 1.50 | 0.189 | 5 | 260 | 1.11 | 0.357 | 5 | 260 | 0.35 | 0.8804 |
NDF, numerator degrees of freedom; DDF, denominator degrees of freedom.
Multi-level statistical model of the CBF in the core, penumbra, and contra-lateral cerebral cortex. In the peri-contusional (penumbral) area, there is a significant treatment effect and genotype effect but the interaction indicates that each depends on the other. There is also a significant change over time that depends on the genotype. There is no effect of Epo in the eNOS ± genotype but the Epo effect is significantly greater in the eNOS WT genotype (.