Literature DB >> 25346212

Long-term outcome after spinal cord infarctions.

S R Hanson1, F Romi, T Rekand, H Naess.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate long-term outcome in patients with spontaneous spinal cord infarctions and secondly to compare outcome with that of patients with cerebral infarction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study includes 30 patients with spinal cord infarction discharged between 1995 and 2010. Surviving patients were contacted by telephone and sent a questionnaire. Data on employment, function, depression, fatigue, pain, and quality of life were obtained and compared to similar data obtained from a group of patients with cerebral infarction.
RESULTS: Seven patients with spinal cord infarction had died after a mean follow-up of 7.1 years. Mortality was associated with poor functioning in the acute phase. Thirteen of 20 responding patients were able to walk. Compared to patients with cerebral infarction, patients with spinal cord infarction had significantly lower mortality, poorer functioning, higher re-employment rate, and more pain.
CONCLUSION: Many patients with spinal cord infarction experience significant improvement. Even though functional outcome is worse, the mortality rate is lower and the frequency of re-employment higher among patients with spinal cord infarction compared to patients with cerebral infarction.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebrovascular diseases; quality of life; spinal cord disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25346212     DOI: 10.1111/ane.12343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6314            Impact factor:   3.209


  7 in total

Review 1.  Spinal Cord Infarcts: Risk Factors, Management, and Prognosis.

Authors:  Deena M Nasr; Alejandro Rabinstein
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Tat-p27 Ameliorates Neuronal Damage Reducing α-Synuclein and Inflammatory Responses in Motor Neurons After Spinal Cord Ischemia.

Authors:  Woosuk Kim; Hyun Jung Kwon; Hyo Young Jung; Kyu Ri Hahn; Seung Myung Moon; Yeo Sung Yoon; In Koo Hwang; Soo Young Choi; Dae Won Kim
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Delayed Hospital Presentation and Neuroimaging in Non-surgical Spinal Cord Infarction.

Authors:  Slaven Pikija; Johannes Sebastian Mutzenbach; Alexander B Kunz; Raffaele Nardone; Stefan Leis; Ildiko Deak; Mark R McCoy; Eugen Trinka; Johann Sellner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Atypical spinal cord infarction: A case report.

Authors:  Koshi Ota; Ryo Iida; Kanna Ota; Masahide Sakaue; Shogo Takashima; Kohei Taniguchi; Masao Tomioka; Masahiko Nitta; Akira Takasu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Spinal Cord Infarction with Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Atsuyuki Kawabata; Masaki Tomori; Yoshiyasu Arai
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2018-06-28

6.  Spinal cord infarction complicating acute aortic syndrome: about 2 cases.

Authors:  Nizar El Bouardi; Naïma Chtaou; Meriam Haloua; Badreddine Alami; Alaoui Lamrani Youssef; Meriem Boubbou; Faouzi Belahsen; Mustapha Maaroufi
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-18

7.  Spinal Cord Infarction: A Single Center Experience and the Usefulness of Evoked Potential as an Early Diagnostic Tool.

Authors:  Dougho Park; Byung Hee Kim; Sang Eok Lee; Ji Kang Park; Jae Man Cho; Heum Dai Kwon; Su Yun Lee
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.