Literature DB >> 25346024

DICOM data migration for PACS transition: procedure and pitfalls.

Peter M A van Ooijen1, Kadek Yota Aryanto, André Broekema, Steven Horii.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transition from one Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) to the other is costly and disruptive. Especially the migration of the DICOM data from the legacy to the new PACS is a very challenging task, and although such a migration will happen in every hospital, literature on methodologies to follow and possible problems and pitfalls is scarce. The objective of this work is to provide insight in the prerequisites for the legacy PACS before starting the migration with respect to vendor and DICOM considerations.
METHODS: The steps involved in migration, possible methodologies, and areas of specific interest when planning migration are given. Possible challenges and problems are defined as well as issues that are often overlooked.
RESULTS: A step-wise approach should be implemented for data migration. Careful planning and testing, continuous observation of the process, and involvement of all stakeholders including the old and new vendors are crucial for a successful transition from one PACS to the other.
CONCLUSION: A proper test migration is a crucial step in the PACS transition process, which can eliminate many of the problems in the actual migration. However, with any migration, there has to be a willingness to take a limited amount of risk since not all problems can nor will be identified in the test migration.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25346024     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-014-1123-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  10 in total

1.  "Permanent" records: experience with data migration in radiology information system and picture archiving and communication system replacement.

Authors:  F M Behlen; R E Sayre; J B Weldy; J S Michael
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Migration from hierarchal storage management to ASM storage server: a case study.

Authors:  D Baune; G Bookman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Migration of medical image data archived using mini-PACS to full-PACS.

Authors:  Haijo Jung; Hee-Joung Kim; Won-Suk Kang; Sang-Ho Lee; Sae-Rome Kim; Chang Lyong Ji; Jung-Han Kim; Sun Kook Yoo; Ki-Hwang Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Hard disk online caches in picture archiving and communication systems archives: how big is beautiful?

Authors:  Stefan Wirth; Marcus Treitl; Ullrich-Gerd Mueller-Lisse; Johannes Rieger; Ingo Mittermaier; Klaus-Juergen Pfeifer; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The new effective tool for data migration from old PACS (Rogan) to new PACS (Fuji Synapse) with integrated Thai patient names.

Authors:  Thanongchai Siriapisith; Trongtum Tongdee
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2008-04

Review 6.  A DICOM document-oriented approach to PACS infrastructure.

Authors:  F Behlen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Strategic radiology systems implementation. Challenges and benefits of moving to a vendor-neutral archive.

Authors:  Mark Hagland
Journal:  Healthc Inform       Date:  2013-02

8.  Multi-detector computed tomography and 3-dimensional imaging in a multi-vendor picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) environment.

Authors:  P M A Van Ooijen; A H H Bongaerts; R Witkamp; A Wijker; W Tukker; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Radiological image data migration. Practical experience and comparison of the costs of work.

Authors:  M Maass; M Kosonen; M Kormano
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.701

10.  Accessibility of data backup on CD-R after 8 to 11 years.

Authors:  P M A van Ooijen; A R Viddeleer; F Meijer; M Oudkerk
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.056

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Transforming Dermatologic Imaging for the Digital Era: Metadata and Standards.

Authors:  Liam J Caffery; David Clunie; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Josep Malvehy; H Peter Soyer; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Analysis of DICOM Image Compression Alternative Using Huffman Coding.

Authors:  Romi Fadillah Rahmat; T S M Andreas; Fahmi Fahmi; Muhammad Fermi Pasha; Mohammed Yahya Alzahrani; Rahmat Budiarto
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 3.  Technical Challenges of Enterprise Imaging: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.

Authors:  David A Clunie; Don K Dennison; Dawn Cram; Kenneth R Persons; Mark D Bronkalla; Henri Rik Primo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.056

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.