Literature DB >> 25345905

Extraction of protein binding pockets in close neighborhood of bound ligands makes comparisons simple due to inherent shape similarity.

Timo Krotzky1, Thomas Rickmeyer, Thomas Fober, Gerhard Klebe.   

Abstract

Methods for comparing protein binding sites are frequently validated on data sets of pockets that were obtained simply by extracting the protein area next to the bound ligands. With this strategy, any unoccupied pocket will remain unconsidered. Furthermore, a large amount of ligand-biased intrinsic shape information is predefined, inclining the subsequent comparisons as rather trivial even in data sets that hardly contain redundancies in sequence information. In this study, we present the results of a very simplistic and shape-biased comparison approach, which stress that unrestricted cavity extraction is essential to enable unexpected cross-reactivity predictions among proteins and function annotations of orphan proteins.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25345905     DOI: 10.1021/ci500553a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  3 in total

1.  The Recognition of Identical Ligands by Unrelated Proteins.

Authors:  Sarah Barelier; Teague Sterling; Matthew J O'Meara; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.100

2.  CAVIAR: a method for automatic cavity detection, description and decomposition into subcavities.

Authors:  Jean-Rémy Marchand; Bernard Pirard; Peter Ertl; Finton Sirockin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  PockDrug-Server: a new web server for predicting pocket druggability on holo and apo proteins.

Authors:  Hiba Abi Hussein; Alexandre Borrel; Colette Geneix; Michel Petitjean; Leslie Regad; Anne-Claude Camproux
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.