Gennaro Selvaggi1, Simona Giordano. 1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gröna Stråket 8, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden, selvaggigennaro@yahoo.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recent literature has raised an important ethical concern relating to the way in which surgeons approach people with gender dysphoria (GD): it has been suggested that referring transsexual patients to mental assessment can constitute a form of unjust discrimination. The aim of this paper is to examine some of the ethical issues concerning the role of the mental health professional in gender reassignment surgeries (GRS). METHOD: The role of the mental health professional in GRS is analyzed by presenting the Standards of Care by the World Professional Association of Transgender Health, and discussing the principles of autonomy and non-discrimination. RESULTS: Purposes of psychotherapy are exploring gender identity; addressing the negative impact of GD on mental health; alleviating internalized transphobia; enhancing social and peer support; improving body image; promoting resilience; and assisting the surgeons with the preparation prior to the surgery and the patient's follow-up. Offering or requesting psychological assistance is in no way a form of negative discrimination or an attack to the patient's autonomy. Contrarily, it might improve transsexual patients' care, and thus at the most may represent a form of positive discrimination. To treat people as equal does not mean that they should be treated in the same way, but with the same concern and respect, so that their unique needs and goals can be achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Offering or requesting psychological assistance to individuals with GD is a form of responsible care, and not unjust discrimination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
OBJECTIVE: Recent literature has raised an important ethical concern relating to the way in which surgeons approach people with gender dysphoria (GD): it has been suggested that referring transsexual patients to mental assessment can constitute a form of unjust discrimination. The aim of this paper is to examine some of the ethical issues concerning the role of the mental health professional in gender reassignment surgeries (GRS). METHOD: The role of the mental health professional in GRS is analyzed by presenting the Standards of Care by the World Professional Association of Transgender Health, and discussing the principles of autonomy and non-discrimination. RESULTS: Purposes of psychotherapy are exploring gender identity; addressing the negative impact of GD on mental health; alleviating internalized transphobia; enhancing social and peer support; improving body image; promoting resilience; and assisting the surgeons with the preparation prior to the surgery and the patient's follow-up. Offering or requesting psychological assistance is in no way a form of negative discrimination or an attack to the patient's autonomy. Contrarily, it might improve transsexual patients' care, and thus at the most may represent a form of positive discrimination. To treat people as equal does not mean that they should be treated in the same way, but with the same concern and respect, so that their unique needs and goals can be achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Offering or requesting psychological assistance to individuals with GD is a form of responsible care, and not unjust discrimination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Authors: Gennaro Selvaggi; Erica Wesslen; Anna Elander; Peter Wroblewski; Andri Thorarinsson; Michael Olausson Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Marta R Bizic; Milos Jeftovic; Slavica Pusica; Borko Stojanovic; Dragana Duisin; Svetlana Vujovic; Vojin Rakic; Miroslav L Djordjevic Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Karl Gerritse; Laura A Hartman; Marijke A Bremmer; Baudewijntje P C Kreukels; Bert C Molewijk Journal: Med Health Care Philos Date: 2021-05-18