Literature DB >> 25344159

Some causes of inter-laboratory variation in the results of comet assay.

Nikolai P Sirota1, Aliy K Zhanataev2, Elena A Kuznetsova3, Eugenii P Khizhnyak3, Elena A Anisina2, Andrei D Durnev2.   

Abstract

We performed an inter-laboratory study to determine the variation of comet assay results and to identify its possible reasons. An exchange of slides between Labs in different stages of the comet assay protocol was performed. Because identical slides, durations of alkali treatment and electrophoresis, and similar electric field strengths (2.0 V/cm and 2.14 V/cm) were used, we concluded that the observed inter-laboratory difference in the results is directly associated with the electrophoresis step. In Lab 1, mouse bone marrow cells were exposed to methyl methanesulfonate at concentrations of 10, 25 and 50 μM for 3 h at 37 °C. In Lab 2, cells the same as in Lab 1 were immobilized in LMA on slides and exposed to X-rays at doses of 3-8 Gy. We found that the transportation of slides after lysis or electrophoresis step, as well as different dyes used for scoring did not produce any significant effect on the results. No substantial difference in the data was also revealed when various software packages were used for image analysis. The temperature of the alkaline solution was shown to increase during electrophoresis and, besides, the temperature heterogeneity of the solution took place in the area of the platform, with a maximum in the middle of the chamber. The temperature heterogeneity could affect the rate of conversion of alkali labile sites into single stranded breaks. Thus, it was clearly indicated that real temperature variations during the alkali treatment and electrophoresis were an essential factor in the variability of the results between our Labs.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alkaline electrophoresis; Bone marrow cells; Comet assay; DNA damage; MMS; X-ray

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25344159     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen        ISSN: 1383-5718            Impact factor:   2.873


  5 in total

Review 1.  Applicability of the comet assay in evaluation of DNA damage in healthcare providers' working with antineoplastic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Zare Sakhvidi; Mohammad Hajaghazadeh; Mehrdad Mostaghaci; Amir Houshang Mehrparvar; Fariba Zare Sakhvidi; Elham Naghshineh
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-04-25

2.  Controlling variation in the comet assay.

Authors:  Andrew R Collins; Naouale El Yamani; Yolanda Lorenzo; Sergey Shaposhnikov; Gunnar Brunborg; Amaya Azqueta
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Ionizing radiation-induced DNA injury and damage detection in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Gissela Borrego-Soto; Rocío Ortiz-López; Augusto Rojas-Martínez
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 1.771

4.  Contribution of Sigma-1 receptor to cytoprotective effect of afobazole.

Authors:  Mikhail V Voronin; Ilya A Kadnikov
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2016-11-07

5.  HiComet: a high-throughput comet analysis tool for large-scale DNA damage assessment.

Authors:  Taehoon Lee; Sungmin Lee; Woo Young Sim; Yu Mi Jung; Sunmi Han; Joong-Ho Won; Hyeyoung Min; Sungroh Yoon
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.