BACKGROUND: Increased blood pressure (BP) is commonly observed in patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors, including axitinib. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and pharmacokinetic data were collected in a randomised, double-blind phase II study of axitinib with or without dose titration in previously untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: Aims of these analyses were to (1) develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for describing the relationship between axitinib exposure and changes in diastolic BP (dBP) and (2) simulate changes in dBP with different axitinib dosing regimens. METHODS: We employed a three-stage modelling approach, which included development of (1) a baseline 24-h ABPM model, (2) a pharmacokinetic model from serial and sparse pharmacokinetic data, and (3) an indirect-response, maximum-effect (Emax) model to evaluate the exposure-driven effect of axitinib on dBP. Simulations (N = 1,000) were performed using the final pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to evaluate dBP changes on days 4 and 15 of treatment with different axitinib doses. RESULTS: Baseline ABPM data from 62 patients were best described by 24-h mean dBP and two cosine terms. The final indirect-response Emax model showed good agreement between observed 24-h ABPM data and population and individual predictions. The maximum increase in dBP was 20.8 %, and the axitinib concentration at which 50 % of the maximal increase in dBP was reached was 12.4 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: Our model adequately describes the relationship between axitinib exposure and dBP increases. Results from these analyses may potentially be applied to infer dBP changes in patients administered axitinib at nonstandard doses.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Increased blood pressure (BP) is commonly observed in patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors, including axitinib. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and pharmacokinetic data were collected in a randomised, double-blind phase II study of axitinib with or without dose titration in previously untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: Aims of these analyses were to (1) develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for describing the relationship between axitinib exposure and changes in diastolic BP (dBP) and (2) simulate changes in dBP with different axitinib dosing regimens. METHODS: We employed a three-stage modelling approach, which included development of (1) a baseline 24-h ABPM model, (2) a pharmacokinetic model from serial and sparse pharmacokinetic data, and (3) an indirect-response, maximum-effect (Emax) model to evaluate the exposure-driven effect of axitinib on dBP. Simulations (N = 1,000) were performed using the final pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to evaluate dBP changes on days 4 and 15 of treatment with different axitinib doses. RESULTS: Baseline ABPM data from 62 patients were best described by 24-h mean dBP and two cosine terms. The final indirect-response Emax model showed good agreement between observed 24-h ABPM data and population and individual predictions. The maximum increase in dBP was 20.8 %, and the axitinib concentration at which 50 % of the maximal increase in dBP was reached was 12.4 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: Our model adequately describes the relationship between axitinib exposure and dBP increases. Results from these analyses may potentially be applied to infer dBP changes in patients administered axitinib at nonstandard doses.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ron J Keizer; Anubha Gupta; Melvin R Mac Gillavry; Mendel Jansen; Jantien Wanders; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Mats O Karlsson; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Brett E Houk; Carlo L Bello; Bill Poland; Lee S Rosen; George D Demetri; Robert J Motzer Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2009-12-05 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Brian I Rini; Bohuslav Melichar; Takeshi Ueda; Viktor Grünwald; Mayer N Fishman; José A Arranz; Angel H Bair; Yazdi K Pithavala; Glen I Andrews; Dmitri Pavlov; Sinil Kim; Eric Jonasch Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: E K Hansson; G Ma; M A Amantea; J French; P A Milligan; L E Friberg; M O Karlsson Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2013-12-04
Authors: Ying Chen; Akiyuki Suzuki; Michael A Tortorici; May Garrett; Robert R LaBadie; Yoshiko Umeyama; Yazdi K Pithavala Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2015-02-08 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Teresa Collins; Kelly Gray; Michal Bista; Matt Skinner; Christopher Hardy; Haiyun Wang; Jerome T Mettetal; Alexander R Harmer Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Ahmed M E Abdalla; Lin Xiao; Muhammad Wajid Ullah; Miao Yu; Chenxi Ouyang; Guang Yang Journal: Theranostics Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 11.556