Literature DB >> 25343057

The HCBS taxonomy: a new language for classifying home- and community-based services.

Victoria Peebles1, Alex Bohl1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As states make home- and community-based services (HCBS) more accessible, researchers have become more interested in understanding service use and spending. Because state Medicaid programs differ in the types of services they offer and in how they report these services, analyzing HCBS at the national level is challenging.
OBJECTIVE: Describe the HCBS taxonomy and present findings on HCBS waiver expenditures and users. DATA: This brief analyzed fee-for-service claims from 28 approved states in 2010 Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) files. We summed all expenditures and counted the unique number of users across each HCBS taxonomy service and category.
METHODS: The taxonomy was developed jointly by Truven Health (at that time Thomson Reuters) and Mathematica Policy Research, with stakeholder input, and reviewed using procedure codes. Today, the taxonomy is organized by 18 categories and over 60 specific services.
FINDINGS: For calendar year 2010, 28 states spent almost $23.6 billion on HCBS, with 80 percent of expenditures categorized as round-the-clock, home-based, and day services. Other services, such as case management, or equipment, modifications, and technology were widely used, but are not particularly costly and do not account for a large proportion of expenditures in every state.
CONCLUSIONS: By providing a common language, the taxonomy presents detailed information on services and makes it easier to assess and identify state-level variation for HCBS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long Term Care; Medicaid; administrative data uses; home care; nursing homes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25343057      PMCID: PMC4204915          DOI: 10.5600/mmrr.004.03.b01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev        ISSN: 2159-0354


  4 in total

1.  Gradual rebalancing of Medicaid long-term services and supports saves money and serves more people, statistical model shows.

Authors:  H Stephen Kaye
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 2.  The cost-effectiveness of noninstitutional long-term care services: review and synthesis of the most recent evidence.

Authors:  David C Grabowski
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) waivers: a nationwide study of the states.

Authors:  Mary C Rizzolo; Carli Friedman; Amie Lulinski-Norris; David Braddock
Journal:  Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-02

4.  The woodwork effect in medicaid long-term services and supports.

Authors:  Mitchell P LaPlante
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  2013
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Predicting 30- to 120-Day Readmission Risk among Medicare Fee-for-Service Patients Using Nonmedical Workers and Mobile Technology.

Authors:  Andrey Ostrovsky; Lori O'Connor; Olivia Marshall; Amanda Angelo; Kelsy Barrett; Emily Majeski; Maxwell Handrus; Jeffrey Levy
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2016-01-01

2.  Comorbidity prevalence, healthcare utilization, and expenditures of Medicaid enrolled adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Rini Vohra; Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2016-10-20

3.  Depressive Symptoms in Recipients of Home- and Community-Based Services in the United States: Are Older Adults Receiving the Care They Need?

Authors:  Renee Pepin; Amanda Leggett; Amanda Sonnega; Shervin Assari
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  Racial disparities in Medicaid home and community-based service utilization and expenditures among persons with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Chanee D Fabius; Kali S Thomas; Tingting Zhang; Jessica Ogarek; Theresa I Shireman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.