| Literature DB >> 25343042 |
Kamaleddin Abedi1, Farshid Ghorbani-Shahna1, Babak Jaleh2, Abdolrahman Bahrami1, Rasoul Yarahmadi3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: No study was found in the literature on the combination of TiO2/GAC catalyst and non-thermal plasma for chlorinated volatile organic compounds abatement in air. This paper presents this hybrid process for the decomposition of chloroform (as a target compound) using a multi-pin to plate discharge reactor. The experiments were performed using a high frequency pulsed transformer as the power supply system to examine the effect of SIE, frequency, as well as initial concentration on the chloroform removal efficiency (RE). Toluene was added as a hydrogen-rich source to shift the reactions into the formation of environmentally desirable products.Entities:
Keywords: CVOCs removal; Granular activated carbon; Hydrogen-rich source; NTP-catalysis; TiO2
Year: 2014 PMID: 25343042 PMCID: PMC4173063 DOI: 10.1186/s40201-014-0119-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Health Sci Eng
Figure 1Schematic diagram of experimental setup.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of NTP reactor.
Figure 3Typical voltage and current waveforms at applied voltage of 8 kV.
Figure 4XRD pattern of TiO nanoparticles coated on GAC.
Figure 5SEM micrographs of (a) GAC, and (b) TiO /GAC.
The BET analysis data for GAC and TiO /GAC based on the nitrogen adsorption-desorption measurements
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Specific surface area (m2g−1) | 969.1 | 935.2 |
| Total pore volume (cc g−1) | 0.5724 | 0.5453 |
Figure 6The effect of frequency on chloroform removal efficiency with NTP-alone process (applied voltage of 18 kV).
Figure 7Influence of SIE on chloroform removal efficiency (SIE 120–3000 J/L and 700 ppm of chloroform).
Influence of initial concentration on chloroform removal efficiency as a function of SIE with NTP-alone and catalytic NTP
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| |||||||
| 120 | 15 | 12 | 10 | 97 | 97 | 95 | 92 | 94 |
| 250 | 20 | 18 | 14 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 92 | 94 |
| 420 | 22 | 20 | 15 | 100 | 100 | 96 | 93 | 95 |
| 600 | 30 | 24 | 20 | 100 | 100 | 96.5 | 93 | 95 |
| 800 | 36 | 29 | 23 | 100 | 100 | 97 | 94 | 98 |
| 1050 | 44 | 36 | 27 | 100 | 100 | 97 | 95 | 100 |
| 1500 | 58 | 44 | 38 | 100 | 100 | 98.5 | 95 | 100 |
| 2100 | 62 | 51 | 49 | 100 | 100 | 99 | 97 | 100 |
| 3000 | 69 | 63 | 61 | 100 | 100 | 99.5 | - | - |
Figure 8CO, CO , and CO selectivity (a) at highest SIE (3000 J/L), and (b) as a function of SIE.
Main components of chloroform decomposition detected by analyzing apparatus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO2 | 40 |
|
|
|
| CO | - |
|
|
|
| H2O | - |
|
|
|
| Cl2 | 74 |
|
|
|
| TCBA | 77-209 |
|
|
|
| TCAA | 148 |
|
|
|
| TCE | 97 |
|
|
|
| NO | - |
| - | - |
| NO2 | - |
| - | - |
| O3 | - |
| - | - |
| COCl2 | 98 |
| - | - |
| HCl | - | - | - | - |
Figure 9GC/MS chromatogram of chloroform products (a) without toluene, (b) in the presence of toluene.