| Literature DB >> 25342919 |
Najib Sufya1, Noora Matar1, Rawanda Kaddura1, Abdulaziz Zorgani2.
Abstract
There is renewed interest in the therapeutic use of honey, including use in the treatment of infected wounds and burn patients. In this study, we have assessed the antibacterial activity of Libyan floral Hannon honey on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, both known to infect wounds. The effects of four concentrations (5%-30%) of honey were compared with that of four antibiotics (ampicillin, tetracycline, polymyxin, and ciprofloxacin) on the growth of these bacteria at early log, mid log, and late log phases. It has been shown that E. coli and S. aureus are to some degree susceptible during mid log phase compared with late log phase, demonstrated by their complete resistance to antibiotics. Chemostat culture was used to investigate the effect of honey on E. coli grown at a steady state with specific growth rates between 0.1 to 0.5 hour(-1). The rate of killing was distinctively clear during the two stages of growth monitored: there was a relatively moderate reduction at the slow growth phase (0.1 to 0.3 hour(-1)), while a dramatic reduction was obtained at the fast growth phase (0.3 to 0.5 hour(-1)), reaching a complete reduction at 0.5 hour(-1). These results complement data using the cup-cut technique. The antibacterial effect of honey was concentration and time dependent, the bactericidal effect was indeed observed at low concentrations, it demonstrates that the honey has more impact on slow growing bacteria than antibiotics have. We suggest that more reduction could be achieved at higher concentrations of honey. These results may have important clinical implications, such as for the management of wound and burn patients.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; Libya; Staphylococcus aureus; antibiotic; killing
Year: 2014 PMID: 25342919 PMCID: PMC4206207 DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S66496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Healthc Patient Saf ISSN: 1179-1365
The effect of a variety of antibiotics on bacterial growth at three different phases of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus
| Growth phases | Type of antibiotic | Zone of inhibition/mm
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early log phase | Ampicillin 10 μg | 6 | 6 |
| Polymexin 300 μg | 10 | 6 | |
| Tetracycline 30 μg | 20 | 6 | |
| Ciprofloxacin 5 μg | 31 | 28 | |
| Mid log phase | Ampicillin 10 μg | 6 | 6 |
| Polymexin 300 μg | 14 | 6 | |
| Tetracycline 30 μg | 17 | 6 | |
| Ciprofloxacin 5 μg | 34 | 31 | |
| Late log phase | Ampicillin 10 μg | 6 | 6 |
| Polymexin 300 μg | 6 | 6 | |
| Tetracycline 30 μg | 6 | 6 | |
| Ciprofloxacin 5 μg | 6 | 6 | |
The effect of nonautoclaved honey on mid log and late log phase growth of Escherichia coli
| Concentration of honey (%) | Number of colonies
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mid log phase
| Late log phase
| |||
| Nonautoclaved | Nonautoclaved | |||
| 5 | 2 | 95.1 | 300 | 0 |
| 10 | 2 | 95.1 | 187 | 37.7 |
| 15 | 2 | 95.1 | 120 | 60 |
| 20 | 2 | 95.1 | 120 | 60 |
| 25 | 2 | 95.1 | 84 | 72 |
| 30 | 1 | 97.6 | 84 | 72 |
| Control 10−4 | 41 | 300 | ||
Figure 1The effect of various concentrations (v/v) of honey on Escherichia coli populations at various growth rates.
Note: ♦, 5% concentration; ▼, 15% concentration; , 30% concentration.