C F Poon1, W C Tse, K O Kou, K Y Leung. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate how the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) influenced women's testing choices following a positive Down syndrome screening. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to compare differences in the uptake rates of invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD) or no testing in one public hospital 1 year before (pre-NIPT) and 1 and 2 years after the introduction of NIPT in private in August 2011 using descriptive analysis and a χ² test. Conventional screening was funded publicly, but NIPT was not. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to determine factors affecting choices. RESULTS: In pre-NIPT and in years 1 and 2 after the introduction of NIPT, 306, 362 and 401 women who screened positive were seen, respectively. In year 1 and year 2, 12.6 and 26.7% of them underwent NIPT while IPD was decreased by 16.3 and 25.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Both chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis decreased in year 1, but only the former in year 2. However, the rate of declining further testing was similar before and after NIPT (p = 0.213). In multivariable analysis, first trimester screening, nulliparity and working women were significant predictors of accepting NIPT, while only nulliparity was a predictor of declining IPD (OR = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of NIPT resulted in a significant decrease in IPD for 2 consecutive years..
OBJECTIVES: To investigate how the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) influenced women's testing choices following a positive Down syndrome screening. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to compare differences in the uptake rates of invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD) or no testing in one public hospital 1 year before (pre-NIPT) and 1 and 2 years after the introduction of NIPT in private in August 2011 using descriptive analysis and a χ² test. Conventional screening was funded publicly, but NIPT was not. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to determine factors affecting choices. RESULTS: In pre-NIPT and in years 1 and 2 after the introduction of NIPT, 306, 362 and 401 women who screened positive were seen, respectively. In year 1 and year 2, 12.6 and 26.7% of them underwent NIPT while IPD was decreased by 16.3 and 25.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Both chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis decreased in year 1, but only the former in year 2. However, the rate of declining further testing was similar before and after NIPT (p = 0.213). In multivariable analysis, first trimester screening, nulliparity and working women were significant predictors of accepting NIPT, while only nulliparity was a predictor of declining IPD (OR = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of NIPT resulted in a significant decrease in IPD for 2 consecutive years..
Authors: Annisa Mak; Helena Lee; C F Poon; S L Kwok; Teresa Ma; K Y K Chan; Anita Kan; Mary Tang; K Y Leung Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Fabienne Trottmann; Anne Elena Mollet; Sofia Amylidi-Mohr; Daniel Surbek; Luigi Raio; Beatrice Mosimann Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 2.915