Literature DB >> 25341985

Radiographical and clinical evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion: effects of cage size and instrumentation type with a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

Antoine G Tohmeh1, Derek Khorsand, Blake Watson, Xavier Zielinski.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective single-cohort observational study.
OBJECTIVES: To compare cage settling rates after extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) across various implant sizes and fixation types. Secondary objectives were to detect factors associated with cage settling and correlation with clinical and radiographical improvement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intervertebral cage settling can occur postoperatively after interbody fusion, limiting the long-term correction achieved with surgery.
METHODS: Clinical and radiographical data were collected on 140 consecutive patients treated with extreme lateral interbody fusion at 223 levels (range, 1-5). All patients received supplemental pedicle screw fixation or lateral plating.
RESULTS: Average follow-up was 15.5 months (range, 12-36 mo). At 12 months, disability improved by 44%, low back pain improved by 49%, leg pain improved by 48%, and quality of life improved by 50% (P < 0.001). Foraminal height improved from 15.7 mm to 21.2 mm, disc height improved from 4.6 mm to 9.4 mm, discal lordosis improved from 4.0 to 8.1, and segmental lordosis improved from 10.7 to 13.7 (P < 0.001). Cage settling 1 mm or more occurred in 20% of cages immediately postoperatively and in 62% at 12 months. Settling more than 4 mm occurred in 5% of cages immediately postoperatively and in 24% at 12 months postoperatively. Pedicle screw fixation was associated with a higher rate of cage settling 1 mm or more compared with lateral plating, though magnitude of settling at the anterior inferior endplate was higher for lateral plating (4.9 mm vs. 3.5 mm). Taller cage height, narrower cage width, and shorter cage length were significantly associated with increased risk of cage settling more than 4 mm at 12 months postoperatively. In patients with no cage settling immediately postoperatively, risk of settling more than 4 mm at 12 months was 6.8 times greater with narrower cages.
CONCLUSION: Risk of cage settling after extreme lateral interbody fusion may be reduced with the use of wider cages to engage more central endplate bone, longer cages to span the ring apophysis and osteophytes, and avoid overdistraction of the intervertebral disc space with shorter cages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25341985     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  30 in total

1.  The choice of supplemental fixation in lateral interbody fusion: video lecture.

Authors:  Antoine G Tohmeh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Extreme lateral interbody fusion. Indication, surgical technique, outcomes and specific complications].

Authors:  Markus Quante; Henry Halm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Custom-made trabecular titanium implants for the treatment of lumbar degenerative discopathy via ALIF/XLIF techniques: rationale for use and preliminary results.

Authors:  Fulvio Tartara; Daniele Bongetta; Giulia Pilloni; Elena Virginia Colombo; Ermanno Giombelli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Radiographic Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Traditional Fusion Approaches: Analysis of Sagittal Contour Change.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Sharon C Yson; Ryan D Horazdovsky; Edward Rainier G Santos; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-05-19

6.  [Advances in research on Cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Long Zhao; Jiancheng Zeng; Tianhang Xie; Xingxiao Pu; Yufei Lu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-08-15

7.  Effect of pedicle-screw rod fixation on oblique lumbar interbody fusion in patients with osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kaiwen Cai; Kefeng Luo; Jinjin Zhu; Kai Zhang; Shengkai Yu; Yi Ye; Guoqiang Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Clinical and radiographic analysis of expandable versus static lateral lumbar interbody fusion devices with two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Richard F Frisch; Ingrid Y Luna; Daina M Brooks; Gita Joshua; Joseph R O'Brien
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

Review 9.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Is the Evidence of Indirect Neural Decompression? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Emanuele Quarto; Andrea Zanirato; Lorenzo Mosconi; Davide Vallerga; Irene Zotta; Maddalena Lontaro Baracchini; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-03-20

10.  Novel Titanium Cages for Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: First Assessment of Subsidence.

Authors:  Paul R Krafft; Brooks Osburn; Andrew C Vivas; Gautam Rao; Puya Alikhani
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.