Yuzhou Zhang1, Carla M Nester2, Bertha Martin3, Mikkel-Ole Skjoedt4, Nicole C Meyer1, Dingwu Shao1, Nicolò Borsa1, Yaseelan Palarasah5, Richard J H Smith6. 1. Molecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratories. 2. Molecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratories, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; 3. Molecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratories, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Graduate Program, and. 4. Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and. 5. Department of Cancer and Inflammation, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 6. Molecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratories, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; richard-smith@uiowa.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) applies to a group of renal diseases defined by a specific renal biopsy finding: a dominant pattern of C3 fragment deposition on immunofluorescence. The primary pathogenic mechanism involves abnormal control of the alternative complement pathway, although a full description of the disease spectrum remains to be determined. This study sought to validate and define the association of complement dysregulation with C3G and to determine whether specific complement pathway abnormalities could inform disease definition. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This study included 34 patients with C3G (17 with C3 glomerulonephritis [C3GN] and 17 with dense deposit disease [DDD]) diagnosed between 2008 and 2013 selected from the C3G Registry. Control samples (n=100) were recruited from regional blood drives. Nineteen complement biomarkers were assayed on all samples. Results were compared between C3G disease categories and with normal controls. RESULTS: Assessment of the alternative complement pathway showed that compared with controls, patients with C3G had lower levels of serum C3 (P<0.001 for both DDD and C3GN) and factor B (P<0.001 for both DDD and C3GN) as well as higher levels of complement breakdown products including C3d (P<0.001 for both DDD and C3GN) and Bb (P<0.001 for both DDD and C3GN). A comparison of terminal complement pathway proteins showed that although C5 levels were significantly suppressed (P<0.001 for both DDD and C3GN) its breakdown product C5a was significantly higher only in patients with C3GN (P<0.05). Of the other terminal pathway components (C6-C9), the only significant difference was in C7 levels between patients with C3GN and controls (P<0.01). Soluble C5b-9 was elevated in both diseases but only the difference between patients with C3GN and controls reached statistical significance (P<0.001). Levels of C3 nephritic factor activity were qualitatively higher in patients with DDD compared with patients with C3GN. CONCLUSIONS: Complement biomarkers are significantly abnormal in patients with C3G compared with controls. These data substantiate the link between complement dysregulation and C3G and identify C3G interdisease differences.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) applies to a group of renal diseases defined by a specific renal biopsy finding: a dominant pattern of C3 fragment deposition on immunofluorescence. The primary pathogenic mechanism involves abnormal control of the alternative complement pathway, although a full description of the disease spectrum remains to be determined. This study sought to validate and define the association of complement dysregulation with C3G and to determine whether specific complement pathway abnormalities could inform disease definition. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This study included 34 patients with C3G (17 with C3 glomerulonephritis [C3GN] and 17 with dense deposit disease [DDD]) diagnosed between 2008 and 2013 selected from the C3G Registry. Control samples (n=100) were recruited from regional blood drives. Nineteen complement biomarkers were assayed on all samples. Results were compared between C3G disease categories and with normal controls. RESULTS: Assessment of the alternative complement pathway showed that compared with controls, patients with C3G had lower levels of serum C3 (P<0.001 for both DDD and C3GN) and factor B (P<0.001 for both DDD and C3GN) as well as higher levels of complement breakdown products including C3d (P<0.001 for both DDD and C3GN) and Bb (P<0.001 for both DDD and C3GN). A comparison of terminal complement pathway proteins showed that although C5 levels were significantly suppressed (P<0.001 for both DDD and C3GN) its breakdown product C5a was significantly higher only in patients with C3GN (P<0.05). Of the other terminal pathway components (C6-C9), the only significant difference was in C7 levels between patients with C3GN and controls (P<0.01). Soluble C5b-9 was elevated in both diseases but only the difference between patients with C3GN and controls reached statistical significance (P<0.001). Levels of C3 nephritic factor activity were qualitatively higher in patients with DDD compared with patients with C3GN. CONCLUSIONS: Complement biomarkers are significantly abnormal in patients with C3G compared with controls. These data substantiate the link between complement dysregulation and C3G and identify C3G interdisease differences.
Authors: Rubén Martínez-Barricarte; Meike Heurich; Francisco Valdes-Cañedo; Eduardo Vazquez-Martul; Eva Torreira; Tamara Montes; Agustín Tortajada; Sheila Pinto; Margarita Lopez-Trascasa; B Paul Morgan; Oscar Llorca; Claire L Harris; Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: C Licht; S Heinen; M Józsi; I Löschmann; R E Saunders; S J Perkins; R Waldherr; C Skerka; M Kirschfink; B Hoppe; P F Zipfel Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2006-04-12 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Nicholas Medjeral-Thomas; Talat H Malik; Mitali P Patel; Tibor Toth; H Terence Cook; Charles Tomson; Matthew C Pickering Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Mariam P Alexander; Fernando C Fervenza; An S De Vriese; Richard J H Smith; Samih H Nasr; Lynn D Cornell; Loren P Herrera Hernandez; Yuzhou Zhang; Sanjeev Sethi Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2015-07-18 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Yuzhou Zhang; Nicole C Meyer; Fernando C Fervenza; Winnie Lau; Adam Keenan; Gabriel Cara-Fuentes; Dingwu Shao; Aalia Akber; Veronique Fremeaux-Bacchi; Sanjeev Sethi; Carla M Nester; Richard J H Smith Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: An S De Vriese; Sanjeev Sethi; Jens Van Praet; Karl A Nath; Fernando C Fervenza Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Fengxiao Bu; Nicolo Ghiringhelli Borsa; Michael B Jones; Erika Takanami; Carla Nishimura; Jill J Hauer; Hela Azaiez; Elizabeth A Black-Ziegelbein; Nicole C Meyer; Diana L Kolbe; Yingyue Li; Kathy Frees; Michael J Schnieders; Christie Thomas; Carla Nester; Richard J H Smith Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 10.121