Literature DB >> 25341142

Radiologists' role in the communication of imaging examination results to patients: perceptions and preferences of patients.

Mark D Mangano1, Arifeen Rahman, Garry Choy, Dushyant V Sahani, Giles W Boland, Andrew J Gunn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that radiology reporting practices would be improved if radiologists were to discuss the results of an examination directly with the patient. The attitudes and preferences of patients with regard to direct communication with the radiologist are not well-defined. The purpose of this study was to survey patients about their preferred method of receiving radiologic results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed to adult patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT or MRI over a 2-week period in June 2013.
RESULTS: The response rate was 58.4% (642 responses). For normal examination results, the preferred mode of communication was a telephone call from the ordering physician (34.1%); only 12% of respondents opted for a telephone call from the radiologist, and 2.6% chose a face-to-face meeting with the radiologist. For abnormal test results, the preferred mode of communication was also a telephone call from the ordering physician (49.8%); 14.4% of respondents selected a telephone call from the radiologist, and 8.3% chose a face-to-face meeting with the radiologist. Patients preferred receiving very detailed versions of radiology reports for both normal (46.4%) and abnormal (81.8%) test results. Patients also expressed a desire to have access to at least key images from their examinations.
CONCLUSION: Patients prefer receiving both normal and abnormal examination results from the physicians who ordered the examination rather than the radiologist. They also prefer to receive very detailed examination results rather than a brief summary in lay terms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  patient-centered radiology; quality improvement; radiology reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25341142     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.12470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  15 in total

1.  Direct communication between radiologists and patients following imaging examinations. Should radiologists rethink their patient care?

Authors:  Andreas Gutzeit; Regine Heiland; Sonja Sudarski; Johannes M Froehlich; Klaus Hergan; Matthias Meissnitzer; Sebastian Kos; Peter Bertke; Orpheus Kolokythas; Dow M Koh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The RADCAT-3 system for closing the loop on important non-urgent radiology findings: a multidisciplinary system-wide approach.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Dibble; David W Swenson; Cynthia Cobb; Timothy J Paul; Andrew E Karn; David C Portelli; Jonathan S Movson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-10-14

3.  Preferences of referring physicians regarding the role of radiologists as direct communicators of test results.

Authors:  Nuri Erdoğan; Hakan İmamoğlu; Süreyya Burcu Görkem; Serap Doğan; Serkan Şenol; Ahmet Öztürk
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Evaluation of Audiovisual Reports to Enhance Traditional Emergency Musculoskeletal Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Luís Pecci Neto; Ivan R B Godoy; André Fukunishi Yamada; Henrique Carrete; Dany Jasinowodolinski; Abdalla Skaf
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Parental preferences on diagnostic imaging tests for paediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Claudia Martinez-Rios; Jennifer R McKinney; Nadine Al-Aswad; Arvind K Shergill; Ada F Louffat; Lillian Sung; Karen E Thomas; Suzanne Schuh; George Tomlinson; Rahim Moineddin; Andrea S Doria
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 6.  Radiology Consultation in the Era of Precision Oncology: A Review of Consultation Models and Services in the Tertiary Setting.

Authors:  Pamela J DiPiro; Katherine M Krajewski; Angela A Giardino; Marta Braschi-Amirfarzan; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Preferences for portable ultrasound devices: a discrete choice experiment among abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance patients and general ultrasound patients in England.

Authors:  Caron Parsons; Kamran Ahmad Khan; Joshua Pink; Alice Verran; Frances Griffiths; Charles E Hutchinson; Stavros Petrou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Optimizing the Radiology Experience through Radiologist-Patient Interaction.

Authors:  Andrew W Phillips; Rebecca A Landon; Gregory S Stacy; Larry Dixon; Andrea L Magee; Stephen D Thomas; Xi Dai; Christopher Straus
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-17

9.  Communication of Pulmonary Function Test Results: A Survey of Patient's Preferences.

Authors:  Debbie Zagami; Jessica Hockenhull; Alanna Bodger; Krishna Bajee Sriram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  ESR concept paper on value-based radiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2017-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.