| Literature DB >> 25339841 |
Ray Boyapati1, Avik Majumdar1, Marcus Robertson1.
Abstract
A novel upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk stratification score (AIMS65) has recently been developed and validated. It has advantages over existing risk scores including being easy to remember and lack of subjectivity in calculation. We comment on a recent study that has cast doubt on the applicability of AIMS65 in the peptic ulcer disease population. Although promising, further studies are required to evaluate the validity of AIMS65 in various populations.Entities:
Keywords: AIMS65; Endoscopy; Gastrointestinal bleeding; Gastrointestinal haemorrhage; Hemostasis; Prognosis
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25339841 PMCID: PMC4202383 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14515
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742