Literature DB >> 25339789

Stroke Survivors' Gait Adaptations to a Powered Ankle Foot Orthosis.

Jeffrey Ward1, Thomas Sugar1, Alexander Boehler1, John Standeven2, Jack R Engsberg2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Stroke is the leading cause of long term disability in the United States, and for many it causes loss of gait function. The purpose of this research is to examine stroke survivors' gait adaptations to training on the Powered Ankle Foot Orthosis (PAFO). Of particular interest is the stroke survivors' ability to learn how to store and release energy properly while using the device. The PAFO utilizes robotic tendon technology and supports motion with a single degree of freedom, ankle rotation in the sagittal plane. This actuator comprises a motor and series spring. The user interacts with the output side of the spring while the robot controls the input side of the spring such that typical able body ankle moments would be generated, assuming able body ankle kinematics are seen at the output side of the spring.
METHODS: Three individuals post-stroke participated in a three week training protocol. Outcome measures (temporal, kinematic, and kinetic) were derived from robot sensors and recorded for every step. These data are used to evaluate each stroke survivor's adaptations to robotic gait assistance. The robot was worn only on the paretic ankle. For validation of the kinematic results, motion capture data were collected on the third subject.
RESULTS: All subjects showed increased cadence, ankle range of motion, and power generation capabilities. Additionally, all subjects were able to achieve a larger power output than power input from the robot. Motion capture data collected from subject three validated the robot sensor kinematic data on the affected side, but also demonstrated an unexpected gait adaptation on the unaffected ankle.
CONCLUSIONS: Sensors on the gait assisting robot provide large volumes of valuable information on how gait parameters change over time. We have developed key gait evaluation metrics based on the available robot sensor information that may be useful to future researchers. All subjects adapted their gait to the robotic assistance, and many of their key metrics moved closer to typical able body values. This suggests that each subject learned to utilize the assistive moments generated by the robot, despite having no predefined ankle trajectory input from the robot. The security of being harnessed on the treadmill led to more dramatic and favorable results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle; gait; orthosis; robotic; stroke

Year:  2011        PMID: 25339789      PMCID: PMC4203663          DOI: 10.1163/016918611X588907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Robot        ISSN: 0169-1864            Impact factor:   1.699


  15 in total

1.  New discovery equals change in clinical practice.

Authors:  E Taub
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1999-07

2.  Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke.

Authors:  Anat Mirelman; Paolo Bonato; Judith E Deutsch
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  T George Hornby; Donielle D Campbell; Jennifer H Kahn; Tobey Demott; Jennifer L Moore; Heidi R Roth
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  An efficient robotic tendon for gait assistance.

Authors:  Kevin W Hollander; Robert Ilg; Thomas G Sugar; Donald Herring
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Ankle training with a robotic device improves hemiparetic gait after a stroke.

Authors:  Larry W Forrester; Anindo Roy; Hermano Igo Krebs; Richard F Macko
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Body mass index and the risk of stroke in men.

Authors:  Tobias Kurth; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; Carlos S Kase; Kathryn M Rexrode; Nancy R Cook; Julie E Buring; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002 Dec 9-23

7.  Methods to locate center of gravity in scoliosis.

Authors:  Jack R Engsberg; Lawrence G Lenke; Kevin W Hollander; Mary L Uhrich; Paul K Commean; Jeng R Lee; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait.

Authors:  Joaquin A Blaya; Hugh Herr
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method.

Authors:  Stephen M Cain; Keith E Gordon; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Coordination Between Partial Robotic Exoskeletons and Human Gait: A Comprehensive Review on Control Strategies.

Authors:  Julio S Lora-Millan; Juan C Moreno; E Rocon
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  A neuromechanics-based powered ankle exoskeleton to assist walking post-stroke: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Kota Z Takahashi; Michael D Lewek; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Development of a New Robotic Ankle Rehabilitation Platform for Hemiplegic Patients after Stroke.

Authors:  Quanquan Liu; Chunbao Wang; Jian Jun Long; Tongyang Sun; Lihong Duan; Xin Zhang; Bo Zhang; Yajing Shen; Wanfeng Shang; Zhuohua Lin; Yulong Wang; Jinfeng Xia; Jianjun Wei; Weiguang Li; Zhengzhi Wu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Experimental comparisons of passive and powered ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with limb reconstruction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Russell Esposito; Kelly A Schmidtbauer; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 5.  Powered ankle-foot orthoses: the effects of the assistance on healthy and impaired users while walking.

Authors:  Marta Moltedo; Tomislav Baček; Tom Verstraten; Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero; Bram Vanderborght; Dirk Lefeber
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Immediate effects of a novel walking assist device with auxiliary illuminator on patients after acute strokes.

Authors:  Wan-Yun Huang; Sheng-Hui Tuan; Min-Hui Li; Xin-Yu Liu; Pei-Te Hsu
Journal:  Hong Kong Physiother J       Date:  2019-05-29

7.  The Actuation System of the Ankle Exoskeleton T-FLEX: First Use Experimental Validation in People with Stroke.

Authors:  Daniel Gomez-Vargas; Felipe Ballen-Moreno; Patricio Barria; Rolando Aguilar; José M Azorín; Marcela Munera; Carlos A Cifuentes
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-24

Review 8.  Application of Wearable Sensors in Actuation and Control of Powered Ankle Exoskeletons: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Azadeh Kian; Giwantha Widanapathirana; Anna M Joseph; Daniel T H Lai; Rezaul Begg
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Visual guidance can help with the use of a robotic exoskeleton during human walking.

Authors:  Myunghee Kim; Hyeongkeun Jeong; Prakyath Kantharaju; Dongyual Yoo; Michael Jacobson; Dongbin Shin; Changsoo Han; James L Patton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait.

Authors:  Romain Baud; Ali Reza Manzoori; Auke Ijspeert; Mohamed Bouri
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.262

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.