PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between variants in prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 1 (PTGS1), prostaglandin F (2α) receptor (PTGFR), and multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4) genes and intraocular pressure (IOP) response to latanoprost in Chinese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: The IOP response to latanoprost was evaluated by percent IOP reduction (%ΔIOP) in the treated eye with the formula %ΔIOP = (Baseline IOP values - IOP values posttreatment) / Baseline IOP values × 100 %. Polymorphisms in PTGS1 (rs3842787 and rs10306114), PTGFR (rs3753380 and rs3766355), and MRP4 (rs11568658 and rs11568668) genes were detected by direct DNA sequencing. The differences among %ΔIOP of genotypes or haplotypes were obtained by use of the Mann-Whitney U test. Association analyses were performed by multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Latanoprost were prescribed to 63 subjects, 60 of which met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the current study. Notably, the %ΔIOP in the rs11568658 GT heterozygous genotype was 10.4 %ΔIOP lower than that of GG homozygous wild-type on day 7 (15.7 ± 2.52 vs. 26.1 ± 2.88, P=0.003), and the corresponding results in the rs10306114 AG heterozygous genotype and AT haplotype constructed by rs3753380 and rs3766355 on day 7 were 7.2 and 10.3 %ΔIOP (P<0.05). Interestingly, similar results were also observed on day 30 (P=0.008, P=0.006, and P=0.002, respectively). Multiple regression analysis showed that heterozygous genotypes of rs10306114, rs11568658, and carrier of AT haplotype were significantly correlated with the lower %ΔIOP. On day 30, the above variations explained 9.9, 10.7, and 17.7 % of the total variability of %ΔIOP in the Chinese POAG patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: rs10306114, rs3753380, rs3766355, and rs11568658 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) correlate with a response to latanoprost treatment in patients with POAG. These SNPs may be important determinants of variability in response to latanoprost.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between variants in prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 1 (PTGS1), prostaglandin F (2α) receptor (PTGFR), and multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4) genes and intraocular pressure (IOP) response to latanoprost in Chinese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: The IOP response to latanoprost was evaluated by percent IOP reduction (%ΔIOP) in the treated eye with the formula %ΔIOP = (Baseline IOP values - IOP values posttreatment) / Baseline IOP values × 100 %. Polymorphisms in PTGS1 (rs3842787 and rs10306114), PTGFR (rs3753380 and rs3766355), and MRP4 (rs11568658 and rs11568668) genes were detected by direct DNA sequencing. The differences among %ΔIOP of genotypes or haplotypes were obtained by use of the Mann-Whitney U test. Association analyses were performed by multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS:Latanoprost were prescribed to 63 subjects, 60 of which met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the current study. Notably, the %ΔIOP in the rs11568658 GT heterozygous genotype was 10.4 %ΔIOP lower than that of GG homozygous wild-type on day 7 (15.7 ± 2.52 vs. 26.1 ± 2.88, P=0.003), and the corresponding results in the rs10306114 AG heterozygous genotype and AT haplotype constructed by rs3753380 and rs3766355 on day 7 were 7.2 and 10.3 %ΔIOP (P<0.05). Interestingly, similar results were also observed on day 30 (P=0.008, P=0.006, and P=0.002, respectively). Multiple regression analysis showed that heterozygous genotypes of rs10306114, rs11568658, and carrier of AT haplotype were significantly correlated with the lower %ΔIOP. On day 30, the above variations explained 9.9, 10.7, and 17.7 % of the total variability of %ΔIOP in the Chinese POAG patients, respectively. CONCLUSION:rs10306114, rs3753380, rs3766355, and rs11568658 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) correlate with a response to latanoprost treatment in patients with POAG. These SNPs may be important determinants of variability in response to latanoprost.
Authors: Catherine A McCarty; Richard Berg; Richard Patchett; Russell A Wilke; James K Burmester Journal: Ophthalmic Genet Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 1.803
Authors: Cornelia M Ulrich; Jeannette Bigler; Justin Sibert; Elizabeth A Greene; Rachel Sparks; Christopher S Carlson; John D Potter Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Craig R Lee; Frank G Bottone; Joseph M Krahn; Leping Li; Harvey W Mohrenweiser; Molly E Cook; Robert M Petrovich; Douglas A Bell; Thomas E Eling; Darryl C Zeldin Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Jeffrey J W Verschuren; Helèn Boden; Judith A M Wessels; Bas L van der Hoeven; Stella Trompet; Bastiaan T Heijmans; Hein Putter; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Martin J Schalij; J Wouter Jukema Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Brent Siesky; Alon Harris; Aditya Belamkar; Ryan Zukerman; Avery Horn; Alice Verticchio Vercellin; Kristen A Mendoza; Paul A Sidoti; Francesco Oddone Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 2.290
Authors: José A Cornejo-García; James R Perkins; Raquel Jurado-Escobar; Elena García-Martín; José A Agúndez; Enrique Viguera; Natalia Pérez-Sánchez; Natalia Blanca-López Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Laura M Dutca; Danielle Rudd; Victor Robles; Anat Galor; Mona K Garvin; Michael G Anderson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 4.379