Literature DB >> 25338933

Differences in wake-up and unknown onset stroke examined in a stroke registry.

John M Reid1, Dingwei Dai, Bharath Cheripelli, Christine Christian, Yvette Reidy, Gord J Gubitz, Stephen J Phillips.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Debate exists as to whether wake-up stroke (WUS) (i.e. symptoms first noted on waking) differs from stroke developing while awake [awake onset stroke (AOS)]. Unknown onset stroke (UOS) with unclear symptom onset time is infrequently studied. AIMS: This study aimed to examine differences in stroke characteristics and outcomes in these three groups.
METHODS: The stroke registry database from Halifax Infirmary, Canada, was interrogated for hospitalised stroke patients between 1999-2011. Information was available on demographics, stroke characteristics, and functional status at discharge and six months (modified Rankin score [mRS]).
RESULTS: Of 3890 patients, 65% had AOS, 21% WUS and 14% UOS. UOS patients were significantly older, more commonly female and living alone than AOS patients, with no difference between AOS and WUS. UOS rates increased from 10 to 16% of patients during the study period (P < 0.0001). UOS but not WUS had a higher stroke severity than AOS. Intracerebral hemorrhage was less common (9 vs. 13%) and lacunar stroke more common (23 vs. 19%) in WUS compared to AOS. In UOS left hemisphere location was more likely, and lacunar stroke less common. Excellent outcomes were slightly lower for WUS. UOS had significantly higher rates of in-hospital mortality (23 vs. 16%, P < 0.0001) and poorer functional outcome six months after stroke (mRS < 3 in 26% of UOS and 46% of AOS, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: WUS has lower rates of ICH but similar stroke severity and outcomes to AOS. UOS prevalence appears to be increasing, with higher stroke severity and worse prognosis.
© 2014 World Stroke Organization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  stroke outcomes; unknown onset stroke; wake up stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25338933     DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  6 in total

1.  Intravenous thrombolysis in unwitnessed stroke onset: MR WITNESS trial results.

Authors:  Lee H Schwamm; Ona Wu; Shlee S Song; Lawrence L Latour; Andria L Ford; Amie W Hsia; Alona Muzikansky; Rebecca A Betensky; Albert J Yoo; Michael H Lev; Gregoire Boulouis; Arne Lauer; Pedro Cougo; William A Copen; Gordon J Harris; Steven Warach
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Wake-up stroke and unknown-onset stroke; occurrence and characteristics from the nationwide Norwegian Stroke Register.

Authors:  Mary-Helen Søyland; Arnstein Tveiten; Agnethe Eltoft; Halvor Øygarden; Torunn Varmdal; Bent Indredavik; Ellisiv B Mathiesen
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2022-04-06

3.  Access to Thrombolysis for Non-Resident and Resident Stroke Patients-A Registry-Based Comparative Study from Berlin.

Authors:  Ludwig Schlemm; Guillaume Turc; Heinrich J Audebert; Martin Ebinger
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 4.  Neuroimaging Paradigms to Identify Patients for Reperfusion Therapy in Stroke of Unknown Onset.

Authors:  Mark R Etherton; Andrew D Barreto; Lee H Schwamm; Ona Wu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Multimodal MRI-Based Triage for Acute Stroke Therapy: Challenges and Progress.

Authors:  Oh Young Bang; Jong-Won Chung; Jeong Pyo Son; Wi-Sun Ryu; Dong-Eog Kim; Woo-Keun Seo; Gyeong-Moon Kim; Yoon-Chul Kim
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 6.  Wake-up stroke: Dawn of a new era.

Authors:  Konark Malhotra; David S Liebeskind
Journal:  Brain Circ       Date:  2016-07-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.