Literature DB >> 25338740

Tiered approaches to chromatographic bioanalytical method performance evaluation: recommendation for best practices and harmonization from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium harmonization team.

S Lowes1, R Hucker, M Jemal, J C Marini, V M Rezende, R Shoup, P Singhal, P Timmerman, T Yoneyama, N Weng, D Zimmer.   

Abstract

The A2 harmonization team, a part of the Global Bioanalysis Consortium (GBC), focused on defining possible tiers of chromatographic-based bioanalytical method performance. The need for developing bioanalytical methods suitable for the intended use is not a new proposal and is already referenced in regulatory guidance language. However, the practical implementation of approaches that differ from the well-established full validation requirements has proven challenging. Advances in technologies, the need to progress drug development more efficiently, and emerging new drug compound classes support the use of categorized tiers of bioanalytical methods. This paper incorporated the input from an international team of experienced bioanalysts to surmise the advantages and the challenges of tiered approaches and to provide recommendations on paths forward.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25338740      PMCID: PMC4287281          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-014-9656-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  8 in total

1.  When do you need a validated assay?

Authors:  Brian Booth
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Best practices in a tiered approach to metabolite quantification: views and recommendations of the European Bioanalysis Forum.

Authors:  Philip Timmerman; Morten Anders Kall; Ben Gordon; Sirpa Laakso; Achim Freisleben; Richard Hucker
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Systematic analytical validation of commercial kits for the determination of novel biomarkers for clinical drug development.

Authors:  William Nowatzke; Thomas G Cole; Ronald R Bowsher
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement.

Authors:  Jean W Lee; Viswanath Devanarayan; Yu Chen Barrett; Russell Weiner; John Allinson; Scott Fountain; Stephen Keller; Ira Weinryb; Marie Green; Larry Duan; James A Rogers; Robert Millham; Peter J O'Brien; Jeff Sailstad; Masood Khan; Chad Ray; John A Wagner
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Workshop report and follow-up--AAPS Workshop on current topics in GLP bioanalysis: Assay reproducibility for incurred samples--implications of Crystal City recommendations.

Authors:  Douglas M Fast; Marian Kelley; C T Viswanathan; Jacqueline O'Shaughnessy; S Peter King; Ajai Chaudhary; Russell Weiner; Anthony J DeStefano; Daniel Tang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Bringing new technologies into regulatory space.

Authors:  C T Viswanathan
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation on method establishment and bioanalysis of biomarkers in support of drug development.

Authors:  Philip Timmerman; Christian Herling; Daniela Stoellner; Birgit Jaitner; Susanne Pihl; Karen Elsby; Neil Henderson; Begona Barroso; Stephanie Fischmann; Arjen Companjen; Amanda Versteilen; Stewart Bates; Clare Kingsley; Ulrich Kunz
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Tiered approach revisited: introducing stage-appropriate or assay-appropriate scientific validation.

Authors:  Philip Timmerman
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.681

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.