| Literature DB >> 25338415 |
Tsutomu Sakurada, Takeshi Okamoto, Daisuke Oishi, Kenichiro Koitabashi, Shina Sueki, Nagayuki Kaneshiro, Katsuomi Matsui, Ryuto Nakazawa, Maki Yoshioka, Yusuke Konno, Yuichi Sato, Yugo Shibagaki, Tatsuya Chikaraishi, Kenjiro Kimura.
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter-related infection is still is the most troublesome problem for continuation of PD without the need to switch to hemodialysis. We have been performing subcutaneous pathway diversion (SPD) as a surgical treatment for refractory exit-site and tunnel infection (ESTI). To clarify the efficacy and safety of SPD, we conducted a retrospective study. From August 2008 to August 2013, 30 SPDs were performed in 26 patients (16 men, 10 women; mean age: 58 +/- 13 years; 54% with diabetes; mean body mass index: 23.9 +/- 3.5 kg/ m2). The reasons for the SPDs were ESTI in 25 patients, and outer cuff extrusion in 1 patient. All patients resumed PD immediately after SPD, and the duration of hospitalization was 11.7 +/- 10.1 days. After SPD, one patient experienced a dialysate leak, and another patient experienced a mild subcutaneous hematoma. Another 4 patients developed exit-site infection (ESI) and underwent a second SPD. Of those 4 patients, 3 presented with another ESI unrelated to the first episode, and all developed an ESI after 6 months or more. The remaining 20 patients experienced no such complications. Furthermore, catheter survival after SPD was 17.4 +/- 13.4 months. To eradicate ESTTI we suggest that SPD, which does not require catheter removal or interruption of PD, is useful compared with the unroofing technique or catheter removal.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25338415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Perit Dial ISSN: 1197-8554