Literature DB >> 2533783

An historical perspective on low back pain and disability.

D B Allan1, G Waddell.   

Abstract

This review of low back pain and sciatica over the past 3500 years tries to put our present epidemic of low back disability into historical perspective. Backache has affected human beings throughout recorded history (Table 1). What has changed is how it has been understood and managed. Two key ideas in the nineteenth century laid the foundation for our modern approach to backache: that it came from the spine and that it was due to injury. Backache had always previously been considered a rheumatic condition. Only from that time were backache and sciatica considered and treated together. Their management was increasingly dominated by the new orthopedic principle of therapeutic rest. What is new is chronic disability due to simple backache. Apart from rare cases, this only began to appear in the late nineteenth century. It escalated after World War II. It appears to be closely related to changed understanding and management of backache: specifically to the idea that backache is due to serious spinal injury or degeneration and to medical prescription of rest. This is reinforced by the improved social support which makes rest possible. Sadly, we must conclude that much low back disability is iatrogenic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2533783     DOI: 10.3109/17453678909153916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl        ISSN: 0300-8827


  16 in total

1.  [In Process Citation].

Authors:  P Gruber; T Böni
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Fighting to help lower costs: Making a financial case for chiropractic.

Authors:  Jc Smith
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2002

3.  Sense of coherence and outcome of low-back surgery: 5-year follow-up of 80 patients.

Authors:  N Santavirta; H Björvell; Y T Konttinen; S Solovieva; M Poussa; S Santavirta
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Simple low back pain: rest or active exercise?

Authors:  G Waddell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Is lumbar discography a determinate of discogenic low back pain: provocative discography reconsidered.

Authors:  E J Carragee
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

Review 6.  Biological treatment strategies for disc degeneration: potentials and shortcomings.

Authors:  Günther Paesold; Andreas G Nerlich; Norbert Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  On the course of low back pain in general practice: a one year follow up study.

Authors:  H J van den Hoogen; B W Koes; J T van Eijk; L M Bouter; W Devillé
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  The Edwin Smith papyrus: a clinical reappraisal of the oldest known document on spinal injuries.

Authors:  Joost J van Middendorp; Gonzalo M Sanchez; Alwyn L Burridge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Sense of coherence and outcome of anterior low-back fusion. A 5- to 13-year follow-up of 85 patients.

Authors:  N Santavirta; H Björvell; Y T Konttinen; S Solovieva; M Poussa; S Santavirta
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Chronic pain--the end of the welfare state?

Authors:  A Nachemson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.