Literature DB >> 25337237

Comparison of neuroendocrine differentiation and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA/TP53 mutation status in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer.

Britta Kleist1, Marcel Kempa2, Michael Novy3, Christian Oberkanins3, Li Xu4, Guojun Li4, Christiane Loland1, Micaela Poetsch2.   

Abstract

Neuroendocrine differentiation of tumor tissue has been recognized as an important prerequisite for new targeted therapies. To evaluate the suitability of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue for these treatment approaches and to find a possible link to pretherapeutic conditions of other targeted strategies, we compared neuroendocrine differentiation and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA/TP53 mutational status in primary and metastatic CRC. Immunohistochemical expression analysis of neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin was performed on archival CRC tissue, comprising 116 primary tumors, 258 lymph node metastases and 72 distant metastases from 115 patients. All CRC samples but 30 distant metastases were subjected to mutation analysis of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and TP53. Neuroendocrine marker expression was found significantly less frequently in lymph node metastases compared to primary tumors and distant metastases (20%, 31%, 28%, respectively, P = 0.044). KRAS mutation rates increased significantly from primary tumors to lymph node metastases and distant metastases within the neuroendocrine negative CRC group (44%, 53%, 64%, respectively, P = 0.042). Neuroendocrine differentiation was significantly less concordant than KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA/TP53 mutational status in primary tumor/lymph node metastases pairs (65% versus 88%-99%; P < 0.0001) and primary tumor/distant metastases pairs (64% versus 83%-100%; P = 0.027 and P < 0.0001, respectively). According to these data, therapeutic targeting of neuroendocrine tumor cells can be considered only for a subset of CRC patients and biopsies from the metastatic site should be used to guide therapy. A possible importance of lacking neuroendocrine differentiation for progression of KRAS mutant CRC should be further investigated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KRAS mutations; Neuroendocrine differentiation; colorectal cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25337237      PMCID: PMC4203208     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol        ISSN: 1936-2625


  36 in total

1.  Relationship of Ki-ras mutations in colon cancers to tumor location, stage, and survival: a population-based study.

Authors:  W S Samowitz; K Curtin; D Schaffer; M Robertson; M Leppert; M L Slattery
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  E R Fearon; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Activation of p53-dependent growth suppression in human cells by mutations in PTEN or PIK3CA.

Authors:  Jung-Sik Kim; Carolyn Lee; Challice L Bonifant; Habtom Ressom; Todd Waldman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Evaluation of a large, population-based sample supports a CpG island methylator phenotype in colon cancer.

Authors:  Wade S Samowitz; Hans Albertsen; Jennifer Herrick; Theodore R Levin; Carol Sweeney; Maureen A Murtaugh; Roger K Wolff; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Roles of the RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathways in malignant transformation and drug resistance.

Authors:  James A McCubrey; Linda S Steelman; Steven L Abrams; John T Lee; Fumin Chang; Fred E Bertrand; Patrick M Navolanic; David M Terrian; Richard A Franklin; Antonio B D'Assoro; Jeffrey L Salisbury; Maria Clorinda Mazzarino; Franca Stivala; Massimo Libra
Journal:  Adv Enzyme Regul       Date:  2006-07-18

Review 6.  The epidermal growth factor receptor pathway: a model for targeted therapy.

Authors:  Maurizio Scaltriti; José Baselga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  A phase I trial of everolimus in combination with 5-FU/LV, mFOLFOX6 and mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab in patients with refractory solid tumors.

Authors:  Autumn J McRee; Janine M Davies; Hanna G Sanoff; Richard M Goldberg; Stephen Bernard; E Claire Dees; Kimberly Keller; Anastasia Ivanova; Bert H O'Neil
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Intratumoral heterogeneity of genetic changes in primary colorectal carcinomas with metastasis.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Fukunari; Takeo Iwama; Ken-ichi Sugihara; Michiko Miyaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Chromogranin gene expressions in colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  A Pagani; M Papotti; G C Abbona; G Bussolati
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  The prevalence and clinical significance of chromogranin A and secretogranin II immunoreactivity in colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  S Ferrero; R Buffa; G Pruneri; A G Siccardi; M Pelagi; A K Lee; G Coggi; S Bosari
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Neuroendocrine differentiation: The mysterious fellow of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Britta Kleist; Micaela Poetsch
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of early-onset vs late-onset colorectal cancer according to tumor location.

Authors:  Yongle Chen; Zexian Chen; Juanni Huang; Jiancong Hu; Xiaowen He; Ping Lan; Xiaosheng He
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  BRAFV600E Mutations in High-Grade Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumors May Predict Responsiveness to BRAF-MEK Combination Therapy.

Authors:  Samuel J Klempner; Bruce Gershenhorn; Phu Tran; Thomas K Lee; Mark G Erlander; Kyle Gowen; Alexa B Schrock; Deborah Morosini; Jeffrey S Ross; Vincent A Miller; Philip J Stephens; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Siraj M Ali
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 39.397

4.  Progression inference for somatic mutations in cancer.

Authors:  Leif E Peterson; Tatiana Kovyrshina
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2017-04-11

5.  Association between clinicopathological features and survival in patients with primary and paired metastatic colorectal cancer and KRAS mutation.

Authors:  Xue-Lian Pang; Qiao-Xin Li; Zhi-Ping Ma; Yi Shi; Yu-Qing Ma; Xin-Xia Li; Wen-Li Cui; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Biomarker concordance between primary colorectal cancer and its metastases.

Authors:  D S Bhullar; J Barriuso; S Mullamitha; M P Saunders; S T O'Dwyer; O Aziz
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 7.  The Increasing Relevance of Tumour Histology in Determining Oncological Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Niek Hugen
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2015

8.  A genetically inducible porcine model of intestinal cancer.

Authors:  Morten M Callesen; Sigrid S Árnadóttir; Iben Lyskjaer; Mai-Britt W Ørntoft; Søren Høyer; Frederik Dagnaes-Hansen; Ying Liu; Rong Li; Henrik Callesen; Mads H Rasmussen; Martin F Berthelsen; Martin K Thomsen; Pawel J Schweiger; Kim B Jensen; Søren Laurberg; Torben F Ørntoft; Jannik E Elverløv-Jakobsen; Claus L Andersen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.603

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.