Literature DB >> 25336877

What is the profile of patients thinking of litigation? Results from the hospitalized and outpatients' profile and expectations study.

Z Tsimtsiou1, Ps Kirana1, K Hatzimouratidis2, D Hatzichristou2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients vary considerably in their intentions to pursue legal action following a medical error. The aim of this study was to explore predictors of litigious intentions in both hospitalized patients and outpatients, determining the relative influences of patients' characteristics, help-seeking behavior, information-seeking attitudes and general health status factors.
METHODS: A representative cross-section of the urologic clinic of a general academic hospital and the associated outpatient clinic was used (a total of 226 patients, 145 outpatients). Data were gathered using in-person interviews conducted by trained psychologists. Attitudes were assessed by "General statements about medical errors", while expectations for information by "Krantz's Health Opinion Survey" (KHOS).
RESULTS: A single multivariate model explained 21.5% of the variance of litigious intentions. Younger age (explained 7.6% of the variation, p=0.04), weaker relationship with religion (4%, p=0.02), less than 15 visits/year to any physician (7.2%, p=0.001), outpatient status (2.4%, p=0.02), and higher expectations for information were associated with higher possibility to consider suing their physician (7.6%, p=0.002). Patients' desire for disclosure of a medical error (agreement in 82.2%) exceeded their expectations for financial compensation, particularly in less severe cases (agreement in 24.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on the profile of patients with high potential for malpractice suits as predicted by patients' age, relationship with religion, health-seeking and information-seeking behavior. Respecting patients' need for information during clinical consultations and proceeding to disclosure of medical errors, when they occur, seems to be not only the more patient-centered approach, but also the best way to lessen the likelihood of a claim. Hippokratia 2014; 18 (2):139-143.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Malpractice; disclosure; litigious intentions; medical error; patient-centered

Year:  2014        PMID: 25336877      PMCID: PMC4201400     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippokratia        ISSN: 1108-4189            Impact factor:   0.471


  19 in total

1.  Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III.

Authors:  A R Localio; A G Lawthers; T A Brennan; N M Laird; L E Hebert; L M Peterson; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Medical malpractice liability in clinical urology: a survey of practicing urologists.

Authors:  David L Sobel; Kevin R Loughlin; Christopher L Coogan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The doctor as God's mechanic? Beliefs in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Christopher J Mansfield; Jim Mitchell; Dana E King
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 4.  Disclosing medical errors: the view from the USA.

Authors:  Allen Kachalia; David W Bates
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.392

5.  Claiming behaviour in a no-fault system of medical injury: a descriptive analysis of claimants and non-claimants.

Authors:  Marie M Bismark; Troyen A Brennan; Peter B Davis; David M Studdert
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Urological medical malpractice.

Authors:  S E Kahan; H B Goldman; S Marengo; M I Resnick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Teaching medical error disclosure to residents using patient-centered simulation training.

Authors:  Sara Sukalich; John O Elliott; Gina Ruffner
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  What patient attributes are associated with thoughts of suing a physician?

Authors:  David A Fishbain; Daniel Bruns; J Mark Disorbio; John E Lewis
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Do women simply complain more? National patient injury claims data show gender and age differences.

Authors:  Karin Pukk; Jonas Lundberg; Roberto V Penaloza-Pesantes; Mats Brommels; F Andrew Gaffney
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.926

10.  Health plan members' views about disclosure of medical errors.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Steven R Simon; Robert A Yood; Brian C Martinson; Margaret J Gunter; George W Reed; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

1.  Trends in US malpractice payments in dentistry compared to other health professions - dentistry payments increase, others fall.

Authors:  R P Nalliah
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 1.626

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.