Literature DB >> 25336668

Additional linear ablation from the superior vena cava to right atrial septum after pulmonary vein isolation improves the clinical outcome in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: prospective randomized study.

Ki-Woon Kang1, Hui-Nam Pak2, Junbeom Park3, Jin Gyu Park3, Jae Sun Uhm3, Boyoung Joung3, Moon-Hyoung Lee3, Chun Hwang4.   

Abstract

AIMS: Although circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) has been considered as the cornerstone for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation, there has been a substantial recurrence rate. We conducted a prospectively randomized study to evaluate whether additional linear ablation from the superior vena cava (SVC) to the right atrial (RA) septum (SVC-L) improves the clinical outcome. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This study enroled 200 patients with PAF (male 74.5%, 56.8 ± 11.7 years old) randomly assigned to either the CPVI (n = 100) or CPVI + SVC-L (n = 100) groups. An RA isthmus ablation was performed in all patients. The CPVI + SVC-L group required a longer ablation procedure time (82.7 ± 17.9 min) than the CPVI group (63.6 ± 16.8 min, P < 0.001). The complication rates were 5% in CPVI + SVC-L group and 2% in CPVI group, respectively (P = 0.445). Two CPVI + SVC-L group patients had post-procedural sinus node dysfunction, which recovered within 24 h. During 12.2 ± 5.3 months of follow-up, the recurrence rate was significantly lower in the CPVI + SVC-L group (6%) than the CPVI group (27%, P < 0.001). The post-procedural 3-month follow-up heart rate variability in the CPVI + SVC-L group showed a significantly greater reduction in the rMSSD (25.2 ± 13.7 vs. 13.7 ± 8.5 ms, P < 0.001), HF (10.2 ± 7.1 vs. 5.5 ± 5.8 ms(2), P < 0.001), and LF/HF (1.6 ± 0.5 vs. 0.9 ± 0.3, P < 0.001) than in the CPVI group.
CONCLUSION: In spite of a longer procedure time and risk of transient sinus node dysfunction, an SVC-L in addition to CPVI improved the clinical outcome of catheter ablation, and was associated with post-procedural autonomic neural remodelling in patients with PAF. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catheter ablation; Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; Recurrence; Superior vena cava

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25336668     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  8 in total

1.  Comparing efficacy and safety in catheter ablation strategies for atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emmanouil Charitakis; Silvia Metelli; Lars O Karlsson; Antonios P Antoniadis; Konstantinos D Rizas; Ioan Liuba; Henrik Almroth; Anders Hassel Jönsson; Jonas Schwieler; Dimitrios Tsartsalis; Skevos Sideris; Elena Dragioti; Nikolaos Fragakis; Anna Chaimani
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 11.150

Review 2.  Elimination Of Triggers Without An Additional Substrate Modification Is Not Sufficient In Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Junbeom Park; Hui-Nam Pak
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-02-28

Review 3.  Neuroscientific therapies for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Peter Hanna; Eric Buch; Stavros Stavrakis; Christian Meyer; John D Tompkins; Jeffrey L Ardell; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 10.787

4.  Heart rate variability after radiofrequency ablation of epicardial ganglionated plexuses on the ovine left atrium.

Authors:  Vilius Kviesulaitis; Aras Puodziukynas; Dainius Haroldas Pauza; Vytautas Zabiela; Tomas Kazakevicius; Raimundas Vaitkevicius; Evaldas Diržinauskas; Vytenis Semaška; Antanas Strazdas; Ruta Unikaite; Kristina Rysevaite; Neringa Pauziene; Remigijus Zaliunas
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Anatomical dilatation of the superior vena cava associated with an arrhythmogenic response induced by SVC scan pacing after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imada; Koji Fukuzawa; Kunihiko Kiuchi; Akinori Matsumoto; Hiroki Konishi; Hirotoshi Ichibori; Kiyohiro Hyogo; Jun Kurose; Shumpei Mori; Tomofumi Takaya; Tatsuya Nishii; Kiyosumi Kagawa; Akihiro Yoshida; Hirata Ken-Ichi
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-10-27

Review 6.  Catheter Ablation of Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: a Reckless Challenge or a Way to Real Cure?

Authors:  Hui Nam Pak
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.243

7.  Long-Term Outcome of Additional Superior Vena Cava to Septal Linear Ablation in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Moo-Nyun Jin; Byounghyun Lim; Hee Tae Yu; Tae-Hoon Kim; Jae-Sun Uhm; Boyoung Joung; Moon-Hyoung Lee; Chun Hwang; Hui-Nam Pak
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 8.  Comparing Efficacy and Safety in Catheter Ablation Strategies for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Emmanouil Charitakis; Silvia Metelli; Lars O Karlsson; Antonios P Antoniadis; Ioan Liuba; Henrik Almroth; Anders Hassel Jönsson; Jonas Schwieler; Skevos Sideris; Dimitrios Tsartsalis; Elena Dragioti; Nikolaos Fragakis; Anna Chaimani
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.