Literature DB >> 25336492

Three-dimensional sonography in the differential diagnosis of interstitial, angular, and intrauterine pregnancies in a septate uterus.

Yusuke Tanaka1, Kazuya Mimura2, Takeshi Kanagawa1, Etsuko Kajimoto1, Kei Takahashi1, Aiko Kakigano1, Satoko Fujita1, Yukiko Kinugasa-Taniguchi1, Masayuki Endo1, Tadashi Kimura1.   

Abstract

Interstitial, angular, and cornual pregnancies and intrauterine pregnancies in an anomalous uterus are separate entities, and the impact of each condition on obstetric outcomes is completely different. However, there is considerable confusion in understanding and managing the natural course of each condition due to a lack of uniform terminology. The single most important factor for differentiating these types of pregnancies is to make an early diagnosis. The differences between interstitial, angular, and cornual pregnancies on 2-dimensional (2D) sonography are subtle. Although magnetic resonance imaging can be used to differentiate these conditions, it is not preferred as the initial assessment tool because of its limited availability and cost-effectiveness. Three-dimensional (3D) sonography has the advantage of providing views of the uterus that cannot be obtained with conventional 2D sonography. We describe 3 cases of interstitial, angular, and intrauterine pregnancies in a septate uterus that were clearly differentiated by 3D sonography. We demonstrate the differences in diagnostic imaging findings and emphasize the importance of 3D sonography in differentiating these entities.
© 2014 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-dimensional sonography; angular pregnancy; cornual pregnancy; ectopic pregnancy; interstitial pregnancy; magnetic resonance imaging; müllerian anomalies; obstetric ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25336492     DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.11.2031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  7 in total

1.  Is interstitial pregnancy clinically different from cornual pregnancy? A case report.

Authors:  Mehmet Akif Sargin; Niyazi Tug; Selçuk Ayas; Murat Yassa
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-04-01

2.  Angular Ectopic Pregnancy Presenting as Rupture of Lateral Wall of the Uterus: Late Presentation in Gestation Week 20.

Authors:  Malihe Hasanzadeh; Salme Dadgar; Yalda Arian; Yousef Yousefi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2017-05

3.  Angular vs. interstitial pregnancy: A case report highlighting diagnostic nuances with stark management differences.

Authors:  Cherie Q Marfori; Mollie Kotzen
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2018-06-20

4.  Uterine artery chemoembolization followed by hysteroscopic resection for management of retained placenta accreta with marked vascularity after evacuation of first-trimester miscarriage in angular pregnancy: A case report.

Authors:  Akihiro Takeda; Wataru Koike; Takaaki Katayama
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2021-09-23

5.  The role of three-dimensional MRI in the differentiation between angular pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Ming-Hua Sun; Le Fu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  The current status of three-dimensional ultrasonography in gynaecology.

Authors:  Chiou Li Ong
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2015-09-25

7.  Interstitial ectopic pregnancy diagnosis by three-dimensional ultrasound and its laparoscopic management: A case report.

Authors:  Firoozeh Ahmadi; Fattaneh Pahlavan; Fariba Ramezanali; Farnaz Akhbari
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-12-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.