Literature DB >> 25336396

Underestimation of risk perception in patients at risk of heart disease.

Bronwyn Everett1, Yenna Salamonson2, John X Rolley3, Patricia M Davidson4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate perception of cardiovascular risk is important if people with established, or at high risk of, coronary heart disease are to engage in risk-reducing behaviours. AIM: This study aimed to determine whether the risk perception of patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary procedure was related to their subsequent engagement in risk-reducing behaviours.
METHODS: Using a prospective correlational design, patients presenting to a tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia for an interventional cardiology procedure were surveyed at baseline and again at six months. Data collected included demographic and clinical information, relative risk perception (RRP-2), psychological status using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and the Perceived Stress Scale, and physical activity using the Physical Activity Scale. In addition, data on medication adherence and cardiac rehabilitation enrolment were collected at the six-month follow-up.
RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 220 participants. Statistical analysis revealed a reduction in anxiety (p<0.001), depression (p =0.004) and stress (p <0.001), and an increase in physical activity engagement (p <0.001) from baseline to six-month follow-up. Higher risk perception scores at baseline predicted an increased likelihood of enrolment in a cardiac rehabilitation programme (p =0.01) and adherence to medication regimen (p =0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed an overall underestimation of risk perception among a sample of 'high risk' cardiac patients admitted to hospital for an interventional coronary procedure, with those who reported lower risk perception being less likely to attend cardiac rehabilitation and less likely to adhere to their medication regimen. © The European Society of Cardiology 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interventional cardiology; behaviour change; cardiovascular disease; risk perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25336396     DOI: 10.1177/1474515114556712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs        ISSN: 1474-5151            Impact factor:   3.908


  8 in total

Review 1.  Improving Medication Adherence in Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Leah L Zullig; Katherine Ramos; Hayden B Bosworth
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy Risk Perception in Patients Considering Natalizumab for Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Regina Berkovich; Jonathan Eskenazi; Aida Yakupova; Evan Lawrence Riddle
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2021-04-08

3.  Low Subjective Cardiovascular Disease Risk Perceptions among Hypertensive Patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Daniel Mengistu Bekele; Dejuma Yadeta Goshu; Alemayehu Worku Yalew; Melinda K Higgins; Rebecca A Gary
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2022-08-05

4.  Self-administered Vitamin D Status Predictor: Older adults are able to use a self-questionnaire for evaluating their vitamin D status.

Authors:  Cedric Annweiler; Anastasiia Kabeshova; Alix Callens; Marie-Liesse Paty; Guillaume T Duval; Michael F Holick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Accuracy of self-perceived risk for common conditions.

Authors:  Phyllis Brawarsky; Katyuska Eibensteiner; Elissa V Klinger; Heather J Baer; George Getty; E John Orav; Graham Colditz; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  Cogent Med       Date:  2018-04-16

6.  Cardiovascular Events and Long-Term Risk of Sudden Death Among Stabilized Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From IMPROVE-IT.

Authors:  Christopher B Fordyce; Robert P Giugliano; Christopher P Cannon; Matthew T Roe; Abhinav Sharma; Courtney Page; Jennifer A White; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Eugene Braunwald; Michael A Blazing
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 6.106

7.  Comparing Patient Preferences for Antithrombotic Treatment During the Acute and Chronic Phases of Myocardial Infarction: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Cathy Anne Pinto; Gin Nie Chua; John F P Bridges; Ella Brookes; Johanna Hyacinthe; Tommi Tervonen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Adherence to oral glucose tolerance testing in children in stage 1 of type 1 diabetes: The TEDDY study.

Authors:  Kimberly A Driscoll; Roy Tamura; Suzanne Bennett Johnson; Patricia Gesualdo; Joanna Clasen; Laura Smith; Laura Jacobsen; Helena Elding Larsson; Michael J Haller
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.409

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.