Literature DB >> 25336050

Assessment of body-powered upper limb prostheses by able-bodied subjects, using the Box and Blocks Test and the Nine-Hole Peg Test.

Liz Haverkate1, Gerwin Smit2, Dick H Plettenburg1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The functional performance of currently available body-powered prostheses is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to objectively assess and compare the functional performance of three commonly used body-powered upper limb terminal devices. STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental trial.
METHODS: A total of 21 able-bodied subjects (n = 21, age = 22 ± 2) tested three different terminal devices: TRS voluntary closing Hook Grip 2S, Otto Bock voluntary opening hand and Hosmer Model 5XA hook, using a prosthesis simulator. All subjects used each terminal device nine times in two functional tests: the Nine-Hole Peg Test and the Box and Blocks Test.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the different terminal devices and their scores on the Nine-Hole Peg Test and the Box and Blocks Test. The Hosmer hook scored best in both tests. The TRS Hook Grip 2S scored second best. The Otto Bock hand showed the lowest scores.
CONCLUSION: This study is a first step in the comparison of functional performances of body-powered prostheses. The data can be used as a reference value, to assess the performance of a terminal device or an amputee. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The measured scores enable the comparison of the performance of a prosthesis user and his or her terminal device relative to standard scores. © The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Box and Blocks Test; Nine-Hole Peg Test; Upper limb prosthetics; assessment; body-powered prosthesis; functional testing; prosthesis simulator; terminal device

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25336050     DOI: 10.1177/0309364614554030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  13 in total

1.  Benefits of the Cybathlon 2020 experience for a prosthetic hand user: a case study on the Hannes system.

Authors:  Giulia Caserta; Nicolò Boccardo; Marco Freddolini; Giacinto Barresi; Andrea Marinelli; Michele Canepa; Samuel Stedman; Lorenzo Lombardi; Matteo Laffranchi; Emanuele Gruppioni; Lorenzo De Michieli
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 5.208

Review 2.  Evaluation of Performance-Based Outcome Measures for the Upper Limb: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sophie Wang; C Janice Hsu; Lauren Trent; Tiffany Ryan; Nathan T Kearns; Eugene F Civillico; Kimberly L Kontson
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics.

Authors:  Laura H B Huinink; Hanneke Bouwsema; Dick H Plettenburg; Corry K van der Sluis; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Case-study of a user-driven prosthetic arm design: bionic hand versus customized body-powered technology in a highly demanding work environment.

Authors:  Wolf Schweitzer; Michael J Thali; David Egger
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  The impact of using an upper-limb prosthesis on the perception of real and illusory weight differences.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Johnny Parr; Greg Wood; Samuel Vine; Pan Dimitriou; Sarah Day
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

6.  Home Use of a Neural-connected Sensory Prosthesis Provides the Functional and Psychosocial Experience of Having a Hand Again.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Linda Resnik; Matthew A Schiefer; Melissa S Schmitt; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Functional evaluation of a non-assembly 3D-printed hand prosthesis.

Authors:  Juan Sebastian Cuellar; Gerwin Smit; Paul Breedveld; Amir Abbas Zadpoor; Dick Plettenburg
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.617

8.  Clinical evaluation of the revolutionizing prosthetics modular prosthetic limb system for upper extremity amputees.

Authors:  Kristin E Yu; Briana N Perry; Courtney W Moran; Robert S Armiger; Matthew S Johannes; Abigail Hawkins; Lauren Stentz; Jamie Vandersea; Jack W Tsao; Paul F Pasquina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Comparison of DEKA Arm and Body-Powered Upper Limb Prosthesis Joint Kinematics.

Authors:  Conor Bloomer; Kimberly L Kontson
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-04-25

10.  Virtual reality-based action observation facilitates the acquisition of body-powered prosthetic control skills.

Authors:  Manabu Yoshimura; Hiroshi Kurumadani; Junya Hirata; Hiroshi Osaka; Katsutoshi Senoo; Shota Date; Akio Ueda; Yosuke Ishii; Seiji Kinoshita; Kozo Hanayama; Toru Sunagawa
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.