Literature DB >> 25335921

Technology and its ethics in nursing and caring journals: An integrative literature review.

Eila-Sisko Korhonen1, Tina Nordman2, Katie Eriksson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past 20 years, the impact of technology has increased significantly in health care. The diversity of technology is growing and its knowledge scattered. The concept of technology is ambiguous in caring and nursing sciences and its ethics remains unidentified. AIM: To find evidence on how the concept of technology and its ethics are defined in caring and nursing sciences and practice. The purpose of this study is to describe and summarize the concept of technology and its ethics in the past nursing and caring literature.
METHOD: The integrative literature review of the past nursing and caring literature. The data were collected from caring and nursing journal articles from 2000 to 2013 focusing on technology and its ethics.The results were summarized and themed.
RESULTS: Technology as a concept has three implications. First, technology is devices and products, including ICT and advanced, simple and assistive technology. Second, technology refers to a process consisting of methods for helping people. Third, technology as a service indicates the production of care by technology. The ethics of technology has not been established as a guiding principle. Some studies excluded ethical reflection completely. Many studies discussed the ethics of technology as benefits such as improved communication and symptoms management, and the simple use of e-health services whilst others remained critical presenting ethical problems such as unwillingness and the inability to use technology, or conflicts with human aspects or questions of inequality.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study indicates that technology as a concept is described diversely. The relation between technology and ethics is not a truism. Despite some evidence, more is needed to promote ethical care when using technology.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caring; caring science; concept; dignity; ethics; integrative literature review; nursing; suffering; technology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25335921     DOI: 10.1177/0969733014549881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  5 in total

1.  Health information technology and health care activists: Where is the place of Iranians?

Authors:  Mobina Ghoochani; Mehdi Kahouei; Morteza Hemmat; Hesamedin Askari Majdabadi; Ali Valinejadi
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-10-25

2.  Understanding family caregivers' needs to support relatives with advanced progressive disease at home: an ethnographic study in rural Portugal.

Authors:  Maria João Cardoso Teixeira; Wilson Abreu; Nilza Costa; Matthew Maddocks
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.234

3.  Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition.

Authors:  L Laflamme; J Chipps; H Fangerau; N Juth; F Légaré; H R Sawe; L Wallis
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.640

4.  Access to health care perceived by parents caring for their child at home supported by eHealth-a directed approach introducing aperture.

Authors:  Mia Hylén; Stefan Nilsson; Inger Kristensson-Hallström; Gudrún Kristjánsdóttir; Pernilla Stenström; Rúnar Vilhjálmsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.908

5.  Users' acceptability of a mobile application for persons with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Astrid Torbjørnsen; Lis Ribu; Marit Rønnevig; Astrid Grøttland; Sølvi Helseth
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.