Literature DB >> 25335645

Identifying veterinary students' capacity for moral behavior concerning animal ethics issues.

Joy M Verrinder, Clive J C Phillips.   

Abstract

Veterinarians face unique animal ethics challenges as practitioners and policy advisors to government and industry. Changing societal attitudes, cultural diversity, and the often conflicting needs and interests of patients and clients contribute to moral distress. Yet little has been done to identify veterinarians' capacity to address these animal ethics issues. In this study, first-year and final-year veterinary students in an Australian university were surveyed to explore moral sensitivity, moral motivation, and moral character and their relationship with moral reasoning. The majority of students were concerned about animal ethics issues and had experienced moral distress in relation to the treatment of animals. Most believed that veterinarians should address the wider social issues of animal protection and that veterinary medicine should require a commitment to animals' interests over owners'/caregivers' interests. There was less agreement that the veterinary profession was sufficiently involved in addressing animal ethics issues. The principal motivators for studying veterinary medicine were, in declining importance, enjoyment in working with animals, helping sick and injured animals, and improving the way animals are treated. However, most students had taken little or no action to address animal ethics issues. These results suggest that both first- and fifth-year veterinary students are sensitive to animal ethics issues and are motivated to prioritize the interests of animals but have little experience in taking action to address these issues. Further research is needed to determine ways to identify and assess these moral behavior components in veterinary education to develop veterinarians' capacity to address animal ethics issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal ethics; ethical sensitivity; moral behavior; moral motivation; moral reasoning; veterinary education

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25335645     DOI: 10.3138/jvme.1113-153R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med Educ        ISSN: 0748-321X            Impact factor:   1.027


  4 in total

1.  Assessing Moral Judgements in Veterinary Students: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study from Germany.

Authors:  Kirsten Persson; Wiebke-Rebekka Gerdts; Sonja Hartnack; Peter Kunzmann
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Australian Livestock Export Industry Workers' Attitudes toward Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Renee S Willis; Emma J Dunston-Clarke; Leah R Keating; Patricia A Fleming; Teresa Collins
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Differences in Moral Judgment on Animal and Human Ethics Issues between University Students in Animal-Related, Human Medical and Arts Programs.

Authors:  Joy M Verrinder; Remo Ostini; Clive J C Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ranking of Production Animal Welfare and Ethics Issues in Australia and New Zealand by Veterinary Students.

Authors:  Amelia Cornish; Andrew D Fisher; Teresa Collins; Chris Degeling; Rafael Freire; Susan J Hazel; Jennifer Hood; Janice K F Lloyd; Clive J C Phillips; Kevin J Stafford; Vicky Tzioumis; Paul D McGreevy
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2018-07-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.