OBJECTIVE: A haematological malignancy is a serious, life-altering disease and may be characterised as an uncontrollable and unpredictable stress situation. In dealing with potentially threatening information, individuals generally utilise two main cognitive coping styles: monitoring (the tendency to seek threat-relevant information) and blunting (avoiding threatening information and seeking distraction). The aim of this study was to obtain insight into the association between cognitive coping style and (a) need for information, (b) satisfaction with information, (c) involvement in decision making, and (d) quality of life (QoL). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, coping style was assessed among adult patients diagnosed with a haematological malignancy, using an adapted version of the Threatening Medical Situations Inventory. Information need, information satisfaction, decision-making preference and QoL were measured with validated questionnaires. RESULTS: In total, 458 patients returned the questionnaire (66%). A monitoring coping style was positively related to need for both general and specific information. Blunting was positively and QoL was negatively related to need for information. Monitoring was positively related to involvement in decision-making and negatively to information satisfaction. Using multivariate analysis, this relation between monitoring and information satisfaction disappeared, and for blunting, we found a negatively significant relation. QoL was not related to coping style. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with haematological malignancies, coping style is related to a need for information, information satisfaction, and involvement in treatment decision-making. Therefore, it is important for health care professionals to be aware of individual differences in cognitive coping style.
OBJECTIVE: A haematological malignancy is a serious, life-altering disease and may be characterised as an uncontrollable and unpredictable stress situation. In dealing with potentially threatening information, individuals generally utilise two main cognitive coping styles: monitoring (the tendency to seek threat-relevant information) and blunting (avoiding threatening information and seeking distraction). The aim of this study was to obtain insight into the association between cognitive coping style and (a) need for information, (b) satisfaction with information, (c) involvement in decision making, and (d) quality of life (QoL). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, coping style was assessed among adult patients diagnosed with a haematological malignancy, using an adapted version of the Threatening Medical Situations Inventory. Information need, information satisfaction, decision-making preference and QoL were measured with validated questionnaires. RESULTS: In total, 458 patients returned the questionnaire (66%). A monitoring coping style was positively related to need for both general and specific information. Blunting was positively and QoL was negatively related to need for information. Monitoring was positively related to involvement in decision-making and negatively to information satisfaction. Using multivariate analysis, this relation between monitoring and information satisfaction disappeared, and for blunting, we found a negatively significant relation. QoL was not related to coping style. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with haematological malignancies, coping style is related to a need for information, information satisfaction, and involvement in treatment decision-making. Therefore, it is important for health care professionals to be aware of individual differences in cognitive coping style.
Authors: Sue V Petzel; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Julie Cragg; Molly McClellan; Daniel Chan; Julie A Jacko; François Sainfort; Melissa A Geller Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Date: 2018-05-23
Authors: G Graffigna; I Cecchini; M Breccia; E Capochiani; R Della Seta; S Galimberti; A Melosi; F Simonetti; M Pizzuti; S F Capalbo; F Falzetti; P Mazza; N Di Renzo; L Mastrullo; D Rapezzi; E Orlandi; T Intermesoli; A Iurlo; E Pungolino; M Pacilli Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Janneke A J Rood; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Corien Eeltink; Frank Stam; Florence J van Zuuren; Sonja Zweegman; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan; Femke Jansen; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Simone E J Eerenstein; C René Leemans; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Josianne C H B M Luijten; Linda Brom; Pauline A J Vissers; Yes A J van de Wouw; Fabienne A R M Warmerdam; Joos Heisterkamp; Stella Mook; Jamal Oulad Hadj; Marc J van Det; Liesbeth Timmermans; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Camiel Rosman; Peter D Siersema; Marjan J Westerman; Rob H A Verhoeven; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 4.711
Authors: Melanie de Looper; Julia C M van Weert; Barbara C Schouten; Sifra Bolle; Eric H J Belgers; Eric H Eddes; Ellen M A Smets Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 5.428