BACKGROUND: Head and neck melanomas (HNMs) account for an increasing proportion of melanomas and have a poor prognosis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and histological characteristics of HNMs with those of melanomas at other sites (MOS), and to identify pertinent clinicopathological subgroups of HNM. METHODS: A retrospective population-based study of incident in situ and invasive melanomas in the period 2004-2011 was performed. RESULTS: HNMs represented 26·7% of 1548 melanomas, corresponding to a density ratio of 3·7 between HNMs and MOS. HNMs occurred later than MOS (71·2 vs. 58·4 years; P < 0·01), included a higher proportion of in situ cases (49·6% vs. 13·5%; P < 0·01) and were mainly lentigo malignant melanomas (73·0% vs. 2·6%; P < 0·01). Invasive HNMs included a higher proportion of thick (> 2 mm) tumours [33·7% vs. 24·1% (P = 0·01); mean Breslow thickness: 2·18 vs. 1·77 mm (P = 0·03)] and nodular melanomas (20·1% vs. 12%; P < 0·01). HNMs in the peripheral area of the head and neck differed from those of central location by a younger age of onset (65·2 vs. 72·4 years; P < 0·01), male predominance (64·4% vs. 33·8%; P < 0·01), and higher proportions of invasive (67·2% vs. 42%; P < 0·01) and nodular (15·1% vs. 7·5%; P = 0·01) melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: HNMs highly differ from MOS, and are clinically and histologically heterogeneous, possibly as a consequence of different patterns of sun exposure. These data could help to improve primary and secondary prevention messages for patients and doctors.
BACKGROUND: Head and neck melanomas (HNMs) account for an increasing proportion of melanomas and have a poor prognosis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and histological characteristics of HNMs with those of melanomas at other sites (MOS), and to identify pertinent clinicopathological subgroups of HNM. METHODS: A retrospective population-based study of incident in situ and invasive melanomas in the period 2004-2011 was performed. RESULTS: HNMs represented 26·7% of 1548 melanomas, corresponding to a density ratio of 3·7 between HNMs and MOS. HNMs occurred later than MOS (71·2 vs. 58·4 years; P < 0·01), included a higher proportion of in situ cases (49·6% vs. 13·5%; P < 0·01) and were mainly lentigo malignant melanomas (73·0% vs. 2·6%; P < 0·01). Invasive HNMs included a higher proportion of thick (> 2 mm) tumours [33·7% vs. 24·1% (P = 0·01); mean Breslow thickness: 2·18 vs. 1·77 mm (P = 0·03)] and nodular melanomas (20·1% vs. 12%; P < 0·01). HNMs in the peripheral area of the head and neck differed from those of central location by a younger age of onset (65·2 vs. 72·4 years; P < 0·01), male predominance (64·4% vs. 33·8%; P < 0·01), and higher proportions of invasive (67·2% vs. 42%; P < 0·01) and nodular (15·1% vs. 7·5%; P = 0·01) melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: HNMs highly differ from MOS, and are clinically and histologically heterogeneous, possibly as a consequence of different patterns of sun exposure. These data could help to improve primary and secondary prevention messages for patients and doctors.
Authors: Karolina Stanienda-Sokół; Natalia Salwowska; Martyna Sławińska; Katarzyna Wicherska-Pawłowska; Anna Lorenc; Dominika Wcisło-Dziadecka; Jerzy Wydmański; Wojciech Majewski Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Date: 2017-11-26
Authors: Renee P Wood; Jane S Heyworth; Nina S McCarthy; Audrey Mauguen; Marianne Berwick; Nancy E Thomas; Michael J Millward; Hoda Anton-Culver; Anne E Cust; Terence Dwyer; Richard P Gallagher; Stephen B Gruber; Peter A Kanetsky; Irene Orlow; Stefano Rosso; Eric K Moses; Colin B Begg; Sarah V Ward Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 4.254