Literature DB >> 25333639

Nasogastric nutrition is efficacious in severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Deirdre M Nally1, Enda G Kelly2, Mary Clarke3, Paul Ridgway4.   

Abstract

In patients with severe acute pancreatitis (AP), enteral nutrition is delivered by nasojejunal (NJ) tube to minimise pancreatic stimulation. Nasogastric (NG) feeding represents an alternative route. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of NG feeding. Secondary objectives were to compare the NG and NJ routes and assess the side effects of the former. The primary endpoint was exclusive NG feeding with delivery of 75% of nutritional targets. Additional outcomes included change to total parenteral nutrition (TPN), increased pain or disease severity, vomiting, diarrhoea, delivery rate reduction and tube displacement. Among the retrieved studies, six were found to be eligible for the qualitative review and four for the meta-analysis. NG nutrition was received by 147 patients; exclusive NG feeding was achieved in 90% (133/147). Of the 147 patients, 129 (87%) received 75% of the target energy. In studies where all subjects received exclusive NG nutrition, 82% (seventy-four of the ninety patients) received >75% of the intended energy. Compared with NJ nutrition, there was no significant difference in the delivery of 75% of nutritional targets (pooled risk ratio (RR) 1.02; 95% CI 0.75, 1.38.) or no increased risk of change to TPN (pooled RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.45, 2.48), diarrhoea (pooled RR 1.28; 95% CI 0.62, 2.66), exacerbation of pain (pooled RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.47, 2.61) or tube displacement (pooled RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.11, 1.73). Vomiting and diarrhoea were the most common side effects of NG feeding (13.3 and 12.9%, respectively). With respect to the delivery of nutrition, 11.2% of the patients required delivery rate reduction and 3.4% dislodged the tube. Other side effects included elevated levels of aspirates (9.1%), abdominal distension (1.5%), pain exacerbation (7.5%) and increased disease severity (1.6%). In conclusion, NG feeding is efficacious in 90% of patients. Further research is required to optimise the delivery of NG nutrition and examine 'gut-rousing' approaches to nutrition in patients with severe AP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25333639     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114514002566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  10 in total

1.  Laparoscopic jejunostomy for obstructing upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Hironori Tsujimoto; Shuichi Hiraki; Risa Takahata; Shinsuke Nomura; Nozomi Ito; Kyohei Kanematsu; Hiroyuki Horiguchi; Suefumi Aosasa; Junji Yamamoto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-30

2.  Management of Acute Pancreatitis in the Early Stage.

Authors:  Narcis Octavian Zarnescu; Sorin Traian Barbu; Eugenia Claudia Zarnescu Vasiliu; Radu Costea; Stefan Neagu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  A narrative review of the mechanism of acute pancreatitis and recent advances in its clinical management.

Authors:  Zhi Zheng; Yi-Xuan Ding; Yuan-Xu Qu; Feng Cao; Fei Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  What's new in the management of severe acute pancreatitis?

Authors:  Yannick Mallédant; Manu L N G Malbrain; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Proximal or distal? That is the question!

Authors:  Atul P Kulkarni
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-02

6.  Prospective, Multicentre, Nationwide Clinical Data from 600 Cases of Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Andrea Párniczky; Balázs Kui; Andrea Szentesi; Anita Balázs; Ákos Szűcs; Dóra Mosztbacher; József Czimmer; Patrícia Sarlós; Judit Bajor; Szilárd Gódi; Áron Vincze; Anita Illés; Imre Szabó; Gabriella Pár; Tamás Takács; László Czakó; Zoltán Szepes; Zoltán Rakonczay; Ferenc Izbéki; Judit Gervain; Adrienn Halász; János Novák; Stefan Crai; István Hritz; Csaba Góg; János Sümegi; Petra Golovics; Márta Varga; Barnabás Bod; József Hamvas; Mónika Varga-Müller; Zsuzsanna Papp; Miklós Sahin-Tóth; Péter Hegyi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Current concepts in the management of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Gautham Srinivasan; L Venkatakrishnan; Swaminathan Sambandam; Gursharan Singh; Maninder Kaur; Krishnaveni Janarthan; B Joseph John
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

8.  Infection rate among nutritional therapies for acute pancreatitis: A systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ping-Han Hsieh; Hsiu-Yueh Su; Chung-Yuan Lin; Yi-No Kang; Chun-Chao Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Nutritional Support in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis-Current Standards.

Authors:  Beata Jabłońska; Sławomir Mrowiec
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Enteral nutrition provided within 48 hours after admission in severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianbo Song; Yilong Zhong; Xiaoguang Lu; Xin Kang; Yi Wang; Wenxiu Guo; Jie Liu; Yilun Yang; Liying Pei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.