Literature DB >> 25333310

Detection and characterization of crystal suspensions using single-source dual-energy computed tomography: a phantom model of crystal arthropathies.

Torsten Diekhoff1, Tobias Kiefer, Andrea Stroux, Irid Pilhofer, Ralf Juran, Jürgen Mews, Jörg Blobel, Masaharu Tsuyuki, Beate Ackermann, Bernd Hamm, Kay-Geert A Hermann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to perform phantom measurements to prove the feasibility of single-source dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) of the extremities using a volume scan mode. In addition, we, for the first time, wanted to determine which concentrations of monosodium urate (MSU) in gout and calcium pyrophosphate (CP) in pseudogout are needed to detect or distinguish these soft tissue depositions with DECT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created a hand-shaped plastic phantom assembled with a descending order of concentrations of MSU (6.25%-50%) and CP (1.56%-50%) with similar attenuation in conventional computed tomographic (CT) images. Dual-energy imaging was done on a standard 320-row CT scanner with acquisition of 2 volumes: one at 80 and the other at 135 kV. Using linear regression analysis, dual-energy gradients were calculated for MSU and CP. Thereafter, we selected a specific region of interest on the dual-energy graph to color-code MSU and CP on the images. Three blinded readers scored 10 scans of the randomly equipped phantom, corresponding to 60 samples, to determine the sensitivity and specificity of this technique. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was done to determine the diagnostic power.
RESULTS: We found a dual-energy gradient for MSU of 1.020 ± 0.006 and for CP of 0.673 ± 0.001. Assessment of the randomized phantom scans indicates reliable detection of MSU at concentrations of 12.5 % or higher and that of CP at 6.25 % or higher, corresponding to deposits with mean Hounsfield unit values of 59.8 for MSU and 101.1 for CP. The sensitivity for MSU ranged from 83.3% to 97.3% at 15/90 mA (135/80 kV) and from 86.7% to 97.3% at 100/570 mA. Specificity was 96.7% to 100% in 15/90 mA and 100% in 100/570 mA of scans. However, there was inferior sensitivity for CP owing to lower concentrations. In the receiver operating characteristics analysis, the area under the curve for MSU ranged from 0.867 to 0.947 at 15/90 mA and from 0.867 to 0.919 at 100/570 mA and that for CP from 0.659 to 0.745 and from 0.718 to 0.750, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This phantom study shows that single-source DECT allows detection and characterization of crystal deposits when present in soft tissue at relatively low concentrations. Further studies in patients have to prove its benefits in diagnostic imaging and treatment monitoring as well as its significance compared with dual-source CT systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25333310     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  17 in total

1.  Acute vertebral fracture after spinal fusion: a case report illustrating the added value of single-source dual-energy computed tomography to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with spinal Instrumentation.

Authors:  M Fuchs; M Putzier; M Pumberger; K G Hermann; T Diekhoff
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Combining non-contrast and dual-energy CT improves diagnosis of early gout.

Authors:  Seul Ki Lee; Joon-Yong Jung; Won-Hee Jee; Jennifer Jooha Lee; Sung-Hwan Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Tumoral pseudogout of the proximal interphalangeal joint of a finger: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Park; Hye Won Chung; Tack Sun Oh; Jong-Seok Lee; Joon Seon Song; Yong-Koo Park
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  A prospective study of dual-energy CT scanning, US and X-ray in acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis.

Authors:  Sara K Tedeschi; Daniel H Solomon; Kazuki Yoshida; Kathleen Vanni; Dong Hyun Suh; Stacy E Smith
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between split-filter dual-energy images and single-energy images in single-source abdominal CT.

Authors:  André Euler; Markus M Obmann; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Achille Mileto; Caroline Zaehringer; Anna L Falkowski; David J Winkel; Daniele Marin; Bram Stieltjes; Bernhard Krauss; Sebastian T Schindera
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Issues in CPPD Nomenclature and Classification.

Authors:  Sara K Tedeschi
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Dual-energy CT in the differentiation of crystal depositions of the wrist: does it have added value?

Authors:  Katharina Ziegeler; Sandra Hermann; Kay Geert A Hermann; Bernd Hamm; Torsten Diekhoff
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Development and validation of a quantitative method for estimation of the urate burden in patients with gouty arthritis using dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  Maximilian Kotlyarov; Kay Geert A Hermann; Jürgen Mews; Bernd Hamm; Torsten Diekhoff
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Imaging of calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease.

Authors:  Jennifer Miksanek; Ann K Rosenthal
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Gouty arthritis: the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Tim Finkenstaedt; Andrei Manoliou; Martin Toniolo; Kai Higashigaito; Gustav Andreisek; Roman Guggenberger; Beat Michel; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.