| Literature DB >> 25332878 |
Magali Chohan1, Declan P Naughton2, Elizabeth I Opara2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Under conditions of oxidative stress, the removal of superoxide, a free radical associated with chronic inflammation, is catalysed by superoxide dismutase (SOD). Thus in addition to acting as an antioxidant, SOD may also be utilized as an anti-inflammatory agent. Some plant derived foods have been shown to have SOD mimetic (SODm) activity however it is not known if this activity is possessed by culinary herbs which have previously been shown to possess both antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. The aim of the study was to ascertain if the culinary herbs rosemary, sage and thyme possess SODm activity, and to investigate the influence of cooking and digestion on this activity. Transition metal ion content was also determined to establish if it could likely contribute to any SODm activity detected.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-inflammatory; Antioxidant; Culinary herbs; Superoxide dismutase mimetic activity
Year: 2014 PMID: 25332878 PMCID: PMC4193968 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
SOD mimetic activities and ICP-AES data for uncooked (U), cooked (C) and cooked and digested (C&D) herb extracts
| Sample | SODm % inhibition formazan production (n = 3) a | Cu (μg/g) n = 2 | Fe (μg/g) n = 2 | Mn (μg/g) n = 2 | Ni (μg/g) n = 2 | V (μg/g) n = 2 | Zn (μg/g) n = 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosemary (U) | 24.5 ± 1.8 | 0.69 ± 0.05 | 0.77 ± 0.06 | 2.96 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0.08 | 1.13 ± 0.04 | 1.93 ± 0.01 |
| Rosemary (C) | 32.9 ± 1.4* | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 2.58 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.11 | 1.03 ± 0.04 | 1.71 ± 0.04 |
| Rosemary (C&D) | 38.6 ± 3.9* | 4.27 ± 0.80** | 1.00 ± 0.61 | 10.39 ± 1.72** | 0.56 ± 0.14 | 4.43 ± 0.74** | 1.51 ± 0.91 |
| Rosemary (STD) | 65.5 ± 14.1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Sage (U) | 19.5 ± 4.5 | 0.92 ± 0.03 | 1.33 ± 0.04 | 6.40 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.15 | 3.58 ± 0.01 | 7.11 ± 0.09 |
| Sage (C) | 27.3 ± 2.5* | 1.29 ± 0.03* | 1.22 ± 0.03 | 6.40 ± 0.33 | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 3.58 ± 0.12 | 8.22 ± 0.20* |
| Sage (C&D) | 32.8 ± 0.8* | 2.36 ± 0.02** | 5.61 ± 0.04** | 12.32 ± 0.14** | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 4.82 ± 2.10 | 7.29 ± 0.13 |
| Sage (STD) | 58.3 ± 18.6 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Thyme (U) | 36.9 ± 6.2 | 1.30 ± 0.02 | 2.02 ± 0.00 | 18.2 ± 0.04 | 0.27 ± 0.15 | 3.18 ± 0.00 | 6.88 ± 0.06 |
| Thyme (C) | 31.9 ± 1.5 | 1.86 ± 0.44 | 2.68 ± 0.46 | 24.4 ± 4.59 | 0.40 ± 0.14 | 3.82 ± 0.53 | 9.17 ± 1.72 |
| Thyme (C&D) | 28.6 ± 1.7 | 3.09 ± 0.75 | 3.41 ± 0.66 | 26.28 ± 1.77 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 6.78 ± 0.40** | 8.29 ± 0.99 |
| Thyme (STD) | 70.8 ± 4.5 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Herbs uncooked (U), cooked (C), cooked and digested in vitro (C&D) and standardised extracts (STD); aSODm: Superoxide Dismutase mimetic activity; 33 units/mL of SOD was used as a positive control 87% ±3.7. bBlank digests values were subtracted from herbs values (C&D). *significantly higher than (U) counterpart (p < 0.05), **significantly higher than both (U) and (C) counterparts (p < 0.05); NS no significant differences between thyme (U), (C) and (C&D) (p = 0.095). ND: not determined.