Sabrina E Guse1, Mark I Neuman2, Megan O'Brien3, Mark E Alexander4, Mark Berry2, Michael C Monuteaux2, Andrew M Fine5. 1. Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 2. Departments of Medicine, and. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia. 4. Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and. 5. Departments of Medicine, and andrew.fine@childrens.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Thirty-five percent of children experience syncope at least once. Although the etiology of pediatric syncope is usually benign, many children undergo low-yield diagnostic testing. We conducted a quality improvement intervention to reduce the rates of low-yield diagnostic testing for children presenting to an emergency department (ED) with syncope or presyncope. METHODS: Children 8 to 22 years old presenting to a tertiary care pediatric ED with syncope or presyncope were included. We excluded children who were ill-appearing, had previously diagnosed cardiac or neurologic disease, ingestion, or trauma. We measured diagnostic testing rates among children presenting from July 2010 through October 2012, during which time we implemented a quality improvement intervention. Patient follow-up was performed 2 months after the ED visit to ascertain subsequent diagnostic testing and medical care. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients were included. We observed a reduction in the rates of low-yield diagnostic testing after our quality improvement intervention: complete blood count testing decreased from 36% (95% confidence interval 29% to 43%) to 16% (12% to 22%) and electrolyte testing from 29% (23% to 36%) to 12% (8% to 17%). Performance of recommended testing increased, such as electrocardiograms and pregnancy testing in postpubertal girls. Despite a reduction in diagnostic testing among children with syncope, patients were not more likely to undergo subsequent diagnostic testing or seek further medical care following their ED visit. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a quality improvement intervention for the ED evaluation of pediatric syncope was associated with reduced low-yield diagnostic testing, and was not associated with subsequent testing or medical care.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Thirty-five percent of children experience syncope at least once. Although the etiology of pediatric syncope is usually benign, many children undergo low-yield diagnostic testing. We conducted a quality improvement intervention to reduce the rates of low-yield diagnostic testing for children presenting to an emergency department (ED) with syncope or presyncope. METHODS:Children 8 to 22 years old presenting to a tertiary care pediatric ED with syncope or presyncope were included. We excluded children who were ill-appearing, had previously diagnosed cardiac or neurologic disease, ingestion, or trauma. We measured diagnostic testing rates among children presenting from July 2010 through October 2012, during which time we implemented a quality improvement intervention. Patient follow-up was performed 2 months after the ED visit to ascertain subsequent diagnostic testing and medical care. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients were included. We observed a reduction in the rates of low-yield diagnostic testing after our quality improvement intervention: complete blood count testing decreased from 36% (95% confidence interval 29% to 43%) to 16% (12% to 22%) and electrolyte testing from 29% (23% to 36%) to 12% (8% to 17%). Performance of recommended testing increased, such as electrocardiograms and pregnancy testing in postpubertal girls. Despite a reduction in diagnostic testing among children with syncope, patients were not more likely to undergo subsequent diagnostic testing or seek further medical care following their ED visit. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a quality improvement intervention for the ED evaluation of pediatric syncope was associated with reduced low-yield diagnostic testing, and was not associated with subsequent testing or medical care.
Authors: Elise A Stave; Larrie Greenberg; Ellen Hamburger; Mary Ottolini; Dewesh Agrawal; Karen Lewis; John R Barber; James E Bost; Ashraf S Harahsheh Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-07-09 Impact factor: 3.263
Authors: Kristen H Shanahan; Michael C Monuteaux; Dalton Brunson; Sabrina E Guse; Mark E Alexander; John J Porter; Mark I Neuman; Andrew M Fine Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2020-10-26
Authors: Karen S Farbman; Kenneth A Michelson; Mark I Neuman; Timothy E Dribin; Lynda C Schneider; Anne M Stack Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Ashley L Marchese; Andrew M Fine; Jason A Levy; Michael C Monuteaux; Kenneth A Michelson Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 1.602
Authors: Yvonne Paris; Olga H Toro-Salazar; Naomi S Gauthier; Kathleen M Rotondo; Lucy Arnold; Rose Hamershock; David E Saudek; David R Fulton; Ashley Renaud; Mark E Alexander Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: C Anwar A Chahal; David J Tester; Ahmed U Fayyaz; Keerthi Jaliparthy; Nadeem A Khan; Dongmei Lu; Mariha Khan; Aradhana Sahoo; Aiswarya Rajendran; Jennifer A Knight; Michael A Simpson; Elijah R Behr; Elson L So; Erik K St Louis; R Ross Reichard; William D Edwards; Michael J Ackerman; Virend K Somers Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Daisy Goodman; Greg Ogrinc; Louise Davies; G Ross Baker; Jane Barnsteiner; Tina C Foster; Kari Gali; Joanne Hilden; Leora Horwitz; Heather C Kaplan; Jerome Leis; John C Matulis; Susan Michie; Rebecca Miltner; Julia Neily; William A Nelson; Matthew Niedner; Brant Oliver; Lori Rutman; Richard Thomson; Johan Thor Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 7.035