BACKGROUND: Neck circumference is a predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, detailed assessment of neck fat has not been explored, and the contribution from individual neck fat compartments to CVD risk is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to measure neck adipose tissue (NAT) compartments and examine relations with CVD risk markers, with the hypothesis that neck adipose tissue (NAT) accumulation preferentially involves specific compartments that contribute differently to metabolic risk. DESIGN: We retrospectively studied 303 subjects with successfully treated malignancies or benign etiologies [151 women, 152 men; mean (± SD) age: 55 ± 17 y; mean body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)): 28 ± 6] who underwent whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography. NAT was measured at the level of the C5 vertebral body, subdivided into posterior (NATpost), subcutaneous (NATsc), and perivertebral (NATperivert) compartments. Data on CVD risk factors (BMI, abdominal circumference, visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue, blood pressure, serum lipids, and fasting plasma glucose) were collected. We compared NAT compartments across lean, overweight, and obese groups and performed multivariate regression models correlating NAT with CVD risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic curve and prevalence ratio analyses were performed to examine the association of NAT compartments with metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: NATpost and NATsc were more consistently associated with cardiometabolic risk, especially in women, correlating with visceral adipose tissue (P < 0.0001) and triglycerides (P < 0.001) and a nearly 1.5-fold increase in the prevalence ratio for metabolic syndrome after adjustment for age and BMI (P < 0.05). NATsc was most abundant in women, whereas intermuscular compartments (NATpost and NATperivert) were higher in men. In both sexes, NATpost and NATperivert showed the largest increment between lean and obese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Neck fat compartments expand differently with increasing adiposity, correlate with CVD risk factors, and are associated with metabolic syndrome, most notably NATpost and NATsc in women. Although neck circumference remains an important method to assess metabolic risk, cross-sectional NAT assessment provides further insight into fat accumulation in the neck. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02205021.
BACKGROUND: Neck circumference is a predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, detailed assessment of neck fat has not been explored, and the contribution from individual neck fat compartments to CVD risk is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to measure neck adipose tissue (NAT) compartments and examine relations with CVD risk markers, with the hypothesis that neck adipose tissue (NAT) accumulation preferentially involves specific compartments that contribute differently to metabolic risk. DESIGN: We retrospectively studied 303 subjects with successfully treated malignancies or benign etiologies [151 women, 152 men; mean (± SD) age: 55 ± 17 y; mean body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)): 28 ± 6] who underwent whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography. NAT was measured at the level of the C5 vertebral body, subdivided into posterior (NATpost), subcutaneous (NATsc), and perivertebral (NATperivert) compartments. Data on CVD risk factors (BMI, abdominal circumference, visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue, blood pressure, serum lipids, and fasting plasma glucose) were collected. We compared NAT compartments across lean, overweight, and obese groups and performed multivariate regression models correlating NAT with CVD risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic curve and prevalence ratio analyses were performed to examine the association of NAT compartments with metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: NATpost and NATsc were more consistently associated with cardiometabolic risk, especially in women, correlating with visceral adipose tissue (P < 0.0001) and triglycerides (P < 0.001) and a nearly 1.5-fold increase in the prevalence ratio for metabolic syndrome after adjustment for age and BMI (P < 0.05). NATsc was most abundant in women, whereas intermuscular compartments (NATpost and NATperivert) were higher in men. In both sexes, NATpost and NATperivert showed the largest increment between lean and obese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Neck fat compartments expand differently with increasing adiposity, correlate with CVD risk factors, and are associated with metabolic syndrome, most notably NATpost and NATsc in women. Although neck circumference remains an important method to assess metabolic risk, cross-sectional NAT assessment provides further insight into fat accumulation in the neck. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02205021.
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ivan R B Godoy; Edgar Leonardo Martinez-Salazar; Alireza Eajazi; Pedro R Genta; Miriam A Bredella; Martin Torriani Journal: Metabolism Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Corey M Gill; Debora C Azevedo; Adriana L Oliveira; Edgar L Martinez-Salazar; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Maria Jose Arias-Tellez; Francisco M Acosta; Yolanda Garcia-Rivero; Jose Miguel Pascual-Gamarra; Elisa Merchan-Ramirez; Borja Martinez-Tellez; Analiza M Silva; Julio Almansa Lopez; Jose M Llamas-Elvira; Jonatan R Ruiz Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Paulette D Chandler; Yiqing Song; Jennifer Lin; Shumin Zhang; Howard D Sesso; Samia Mora; Edward L Giovannucci; Kathryn E Rexrode; M Vinayaga Moorthy; Chunying Li; Paul M Ridker; I-Min Lee; JoAnn E Manson; Julie E Buring; Lu Wang Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Nora E Straznicky; Mariee T Grima; Carolina I Sari; Nina Eikelis; Paul J Nestel; John B Dixon; Gavin W Lambert; Markus P Schlaich; Sarah E Phillips; Elisabeth A Lambert Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Christopher M Cielo; Brendan T Keenan; Andrew Wiemken; Ignacio E Tapia; Andrea Kelly; Richard J Schwab Journal: Sleep Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 6.313