OBJECTIVE: The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a composite measure of disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis. The aims of this study were to determine the most appropriate method for calculating the ASDAS using the C-reactive protein (CRP) level when the conventional CRP level was below the limit of detection, to determine how low CRP values obtained by high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) measurement influence ASDAS-CRP results, and to test agreement between different ASDAS formulae. METHODS: Patients with axial spondyloarthritis who had a conventional CRP level below the limit of detection (5 mg/liter) were selected (n = 257). The ASDAS–conventional CRP with 11 different imputations for the conventional CRP value (range 0–5 mg/liter, at 0.5-mg/liter intervals) was calculated. The ASDAS-hsCRP and ASDAS using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were also calculated. Agreement between the ASDAS formulae was tested. RESULTS: The ASDAS-hsCRP showed better agreement with the ASDAS-CRP calculated using the conventional CRP imputation values of 1.5 and 2.0 mg/liter and with the ASDAS-ESR than with other imputed formulae. Disagreement occurred mainly in lower disease activity states (inactive/moderate disease activity). When the CRP value was <2 mg/liter, the resulting ASDAS-CRP scores may have been inappropriately low. CONCLUSION: When the conventional CRP level is below the limit of detection or when the hsCRP level is <2 mg/liter, the constant value of 2 mg/liter should be used to calculate the ASDAS-CRP score. There is good agreement between the ASDAS-hsCRP and ASDAS-ESR; however, formulae are not interchangeable.
OBJECTIVE: The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a composite measure of disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis. The aims of this study were to determine the most appropriate method for calculating the ASDAS using the C-reactive protein (CRP) level when the conventional CRP level was below the limit of detection, to determine how low CRP values obtained by high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) measurement influence ASDAS-CRP results, and to test agreement between different ASDAS formulae. METHODS:Patients with axial spondyloarthritis who had a conventional CRP level below the limit of detection (5 mg/liter) were selected (n = 257). The ASDAS–conventional CRP with 11 different imputations for the conventional CRP value (range 0–5 mg/liter, at 0.5-mg/liter intervals) was calculated. The ASDAS-hsCRP and ASDAS using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were also calculated. Agreement between the ASDAS formulae was tested. RESULTS: The ASDAS-hsCRP showed better agreement with the ASDAS-CRP calculated using the conventional CRP imputation values of 1.5 and 2.0 mg/liter and with the ASDAS-ESR than with other imputed formulae. Disagreement occurred mainly in lower disease activity states (inactive/moderate disease activity). When the CRP value was <2 mg/liter, the resulting ASDAS-CRP scores may have been inappropriately low. CONCLUSION: When the conventional CRP level is below the limit of detection or when the hsCRP level is <2 mg/liter, the constant value of 2 mg/liter should be used to calculate the ASDAS-CRP score. There is good agreement between the ASDAS-hsCRP and ASDAS-ESR; however, formulae are not interchangeable.
Authors: U Kiltz; J Braun; A Becker; J-F Chenot; M Dreimann; L Hammel; A Heiligenhaus; K-G Hermann; R Klett; D Krause; K-F Kreitner; U Lange; A Lauterbach; W Mau; R Mössner; U Oberschelp; S Philipp; U Pleyer; M Rudwaleit; E Schneider; T L Schulte; J Sieper; A Stallmach; B Swoboda; M Winking Journal: Z Rheumatol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.372
Authors: Jean W Liew; Michael M Ward; John D Reveille; Michael Weisman; Matthew A Brown; MinJae Lee; Mohammed Rahbar; Susan R Heckbert; Lianne S Gensler Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Roxana Rubio Vargas; Rosaline van den Berg; Miranda van Lunteren; Zineb Ez-Zaitouni; Pauline A C Bakker; Hanne Dagfinrud; Roberta Ramonda; Robert Landewé; Esmeralda Molenaar; Floris A van Gaalen; Désirée van der Heijde Journal: RMD Open Date: 2016-06-16
Authors: Atul Deodhar; Lianne S Gensler; Jonathan Kay; Walter P Maksymowych; Nigil Haroon; Robert Landewé; Martin Rudwaleit; Stephen Hall; Lars Bauer; Bengt Hoepken; Natasha de Peyrecave; Brian Kilgallen; Désirée van der Heijde Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Atul Deodhar; Désirée van der Heijde; Joachim Sieper; Filip Van den Bosch; Walter P Maksymowych; Tae-Hwan Kim; Mitsumasa Kishimoto; Andrew Ostor; Bernard Combe; Yunxia Sui; Alvina D Chu; In-Ho Song Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 15.483