BACKGROUND: Only a few papers have focused on the surgical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with the metabolic syndrome. We compared the outcomes of patients with metabolic HCC with those of patients with non-B, non-C HCC associated with other etiologies. METHODS: Metabolic HCC was defined as HCC arising in patients with at least three of the following metabolic disorders: central obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. A total of 246 patients with non-B, non-C HCC were divided into three groups: metabolic HCC (n = 35), alcoholic HCC (n = 114), and cryptogenic HCC (n = 97). Clinical characteristics, surgical data, and survival were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: Metabolic HCC was diagnosed at a significantly higher age than alcoholic (75 vs. 68 years, P = 0.004) and cryptogenic HCCs (75 vs. 71 years, P = 0.027). Postoperative complications occurred significantly higher in patients with metabolic HCC compared with those with cryptogenic HCC (40.0 vs. 22.7 %, P = 0.049). Especially, pulmonary complications were significant in metabolic HCC compared with cryptogenic HCC (22.9 vs. 8.2 %, P = 0.023). The overall survival rates in the metabolic, alcoholic, and cryptogenic HCC groups were 96.7 % (95 % CI, 90.5-100), 96.3 % (95 % CI, 92.8-99.9), and 95.6 % (95 % CI, 91.5-99.9) at 1 year, respectively, and 87.2 % (95 % CI, 74.5-100), 82.9 % (95 % CI, 74.6-92.2), and 84.5 % (95 % CI, 75.7-94.3) at 3 years, respectively (P = 0.84). The disease-free survival rates in each group were 74.4 % (95 % CI, 60.5-91.5), 76.9 % (95 % CI, 69.2-85.5), and 74.3 % (95 % CI, 65.0-84.8) at 1 year, respectively, and 29.3 % (95 % CI, 16.6-51.8), 39.0 % (95 % CI, 29.7-51.2), and 41.1 % (95 % CI, 29.7-56.8) at 3 years, respectively, (P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic HCC patients have specific risks of postoperative complication related to the metabolic syndrome.
BACKGROUND: Only a few papers have focused on the surgical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with the metabolic syndrome. We compared the outcomes of patients with metabolic HCC with those of patients with non-B, non-C HCC associated with other etiologies. METHODS: Metabolic HCC was defined as HCC arising in patients with at least three of the following metabolic disorders: central obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. A total of 246 patients with non-B, non-C HCC were divided into three groups: metabolic HCC (n = 35), alcoholic HCC (n = 114), and cryptogenic HCC (n = 97). Clinical characteristics, surgical data, and survival were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: Metabolic HCC was diagnosed at a significantly higher age than alcoholic (75 vs. 68 years, P = 0.004) and cryptogenic HCCs (75 vs. 71 years, P = 0.027). Postoperative complications occurred significantly higher in patients with metabolic HCC compared with those with cryptogenic HCC (40.0 vs. 22.7 %, P = 0.049). Especially, pulmonary complications were significant in metabolic HCC compared with cryptogenic HCC (22.9 vs. 8.2 %, P = 0.023). The overall survival rates in the metabolic, alcoholic, and cryptogenic HCC groups were 96.7 % (95 % CI, 90.5-100), 96.3 % (95 % CI, 92.8-99.9), and 95.6 % (95 % CI, 91.5-99.9) at 1 year, respectively, and 87.2 % (95 % CI, 74.5-100), 82.9 % (95 % CI, 74.6-92.2), and 84.5 % (95 % CI, 75.7-94.3) at 3 years, respectively (P = 0.84). The disease-free survival rates in each group were 74.4 % (95 % CI, 60.5-91.5), 76.9 % (95 % CI, 69.2-85.5), and 74.3 % (95 % CI, 65.0-84.8) at 1 year, respectively, and 29.3 % (95 % CI, 16.6-51.8), 39.0 % (95 % CI, 29.7-51.2), and 41.1 % (95 % CI, 29.7-56.8) at 3 years, respectively, (P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic HCCpatients have specific risks of postoperative complication related to the metabolic syndrome.
Authors: Srinevas K Reddy; Jennifer L Steel; Hui-Wei Chen; David J DeMateo; Jon Cardinal; Jaideep Behari; Abhinav Humar; J Wallis Marsh; David A Geller; Allan Tsung Journal: Hepatology Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Tania M Welzel; Barry I Graubard; Stefan Zeuzem; Hashem B El-Serag; Jessica A Davila; Katherine A McGlynn Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: David E Kleiner; Elizabeth M Brunt; Mark Van Natta; Cynthia Behling; Melissa J Contos; Oscar W Cummings; Linda D Ferrell; Yao-Chang Liu; Michael S Torbenson; Aynur Unalp-Arida; Matthew Yeh; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Linda M Fletcher; Jeannette L Dixon; David M Purdie; Lawrie W Powell; Darrell H G Crawford Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Matthias Heuer; Gernot M Kaiser; Alisan Kahraman; Mark Banysch; Fuat H Saner; Zoltan Mathé; Guido Gerken; Andreas Paul; Ali Canbay; Jürgen W Treckmann Journal: Digestion Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 3.216
Authors: Lucas McCormack; Henrik Petrowsky; Wolfram Jochum; Katarzyna Furrer; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Anastasia Murtha-Lemekhova; Juri Fuchs; Svenja Feiler; Erik Schulz; Miriam Teroerde; Eva Kalkum; Rosa Klotz; Adrian Billeter; Pascal Probst; Katrin Hoffmann Journal: BMC Med Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 8.775