Literature DB >> 25331439

Are vibrissae viable sensory structures for prey capture in northern elephant seals, Mirounga angustirostris?

Kristen A Mcgovern1, Christopher D Marshall, Randall W Davis.   

Abstract

Little is known about the tactics northern elephant seals (NES) use to capture prey due to the difficulties in observing these animals underwater. NES forage on vertically migrating prey at depths >500 m during day and at night where light levels are negligible. Although NES have increased visual sensitivity in deep water, vision is likely a limited sensory modality. Still images of NES foraging show that the mystacial vibrissae are protracted before prey capture. As a representative phocid, harbor seals can follow hydrodynamic trails using their vibrissae, and are highly sensitive to water velocity changes. In lieu of performance data, vibrissal innervation can be used as a proxy for sensitivity. Although comparative data are few, seals average 1,000 to 1,600 axons per vibrissa (five to eight times more than terrestrial mammals). To test the hypothesis that NES have increased innervation as other pinnipeds, vibrissae from the ventral-caudal mystacial field from nine individuals were sectioned and stained for microstructure (trichrome) and innervation (Bodian silver stain). Follicles were tripartite and consisted of lower and upper cavernous sinuses separated by a ring sinus containing an asymmetrical ringwulst. The deep vibrissal nerve penetrated the follicular capsule at the base, branched into several bundles, and coursed through the lower cavernous sinus to the ring sinus. Axons in the ring sinus terminated in the ringwulst and along the inner conical body. NES averaged 1,584 axons per vibrissa. The results add to the growing body of evidence that phocids, and perhaps all pinnipeds, possess highly sensitive mystacial vibrissae that detect prey.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  elephant seals; foraging; pinnipeds; tactile sensory systems; vibrissae

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25331439     DOI: 10.1002/ar.23061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  7 in total

1.  Somatosensory brainstem, thalamus, and cortex of the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus).

Authors:  Eva K Sawyer; Emily C Turner; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Whiskers as hydrodynamic prey sensors in foraging seals.

Authors:  Taiki Adachi; Yasuhiko Naito; Patrick W Robinson; Daniel P Costa; Luis A Hückstädt; Rachel R Holser; Wataru Iwasaki; Akinori Takahashi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Innervation patterns of sea otter (Enhydra lutris) mystacial follicle-sinus complexes.

Authors:  Christopher D Marshall; Kelly Rozas; Brian Kot; Verena A Gill
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.856

4.  Quantifying the three-dimensional facial morphology of the laboratory rat with a focus on the vibrissae.

Authors:  Hayley M Belli; Chris S Bresee; Matthew M Graff; Mitra J Z Hartmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Pinnipeds orient and control their whiskers: a study on Pacific walrus, California sea lion and Harbor seal.

Authors:  Alyxandra O Milne; Catherine Smith; Llwyd D Orton; Matthew S Sullivan; Robyn A Grant
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Constraints on the deformation of the vibrissa within the follicle.

Authors:  Yifu Luo; Chris S Bresee; John W Rudnicki; Mitra J Z Hartmann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Three-dimensional space use during the bottom phase of southern elephant seal dives.

Authors:  Yves Le Bras; Joffrey Jouma'a; Christophe Guinet
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.