Literature DB >> 25331235

Peyronie's disease: urologist's knowledge base and practice patterns.

J Sullivan1, D Moskovic, C Nelson, L Levine, J Mulhall.   

Abstract

Peyronie's disease (PD) is a poorly understood clinical entity. We performed an in-depth analysis of the knowledge base and current practice patterns of urologists in the United States. A 46-question instrument was created by two experienced PD practitioners and emailed to current American Urology Association members nationally. Questions were either multiple-choice or used a visual analogue scale. Responses regarding treatment options were answered by ranking a list of utilized therapies by preference. Data were aggregated and mean values for each category compiled. Responses were received from 639 urologists (67% in private practice). Almost all (98%) reported seeing PD patients with regularity. Twenty-six percent believed PD prevalence is ≤1%, a small fraction (5%) reporting prevalence as ≥10%. Only 3% referred patients to a subspecialist in PD. Twenty-six percent believed PD is a condition that does not warrant any treatment. The preferred initial management was with oral agents (81%). Of those who used intralesional injections as first line, verapamil was most commonly selected (67%). Seventy-nine percent perform surgery for PD with 86% reporting the optimal timing at ≥12 months after onset of symptoms. Seventy percent perform penile plication, most commonly the Nesbit technique (54%), 61% perform implant surgery and 37% reported performing plaque incision/excision and grafting. Although PD is now a more recognized condition, there are still large variances in knowledge and management strategies. Prospective clinical studies are needed to elucidate standardized management guidelines and a more cohesive strategy to manage this common disease.
© 2014 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peyronie's disease; medical management; practice patterns; surgical management; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25331235     DOI: 10.1111/andr.292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  4 in total

Review 1.  Comparing and Contrasting Peyronie's Disease Guidelines: Points of Consensus and Deviation.

Authors:  Madeleine G Manka; Lindsay A White; Faysal A Yafi; John P Mulhall; Laurence A Levine; Matthew J Ziegelmann
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 2.  Peyronie's disease: a literature review on epidemiology, genetics, pathophysiology, diagnosis and work-up.

Authors:  Sultan Al-Thakafi; Naif Al-Hathal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-06

3.  Penile Plication With or Without Degloving of the Penis Results in Similar Outcomes.

Authors:  Rustam Kadirov; Burhan Coskun; Onur Kaygisiz; Kadir Omur Gunseren; Yakup Kordan; Ismet Yavascaoglu; Hakan Kilicarslan
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.491

4.  Trends in treatment of Peyronie's disease in adult men in the United States from 2008 to 2017-results from an encounter and claims database.

Authors:  Odinachi I Moghalu; Rupam Das; Joshua Horns; Alexander Campbell; James M Hotaling; Alexander W Pastuszak
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.408

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.