Literature DB >> 25331033

Effects of watching eyes and norm cues on charitable giving in a surreptitious behavioral experiment.

Moe Fathi1, Melissa Bateson1, Daniel Nettle1.   

Abstract

A series of experimental studies by multiple groups of researchers have found that displaying images of watching eyes causes people to behave more prosocially. It is not yet clear whether watching eyes increase prosocial motivation per se, or whether they simply make people's behavior more normative. Here, we report results from a surreptitious behavioral experiment examining the impacts of watching eye images and cues to local norms on charitable donations in a controlled setting. Eye images significantly increased average donations. Eye images did not make people conform more closely to the apparent norm overall. Instead, there were different patterns according to the apparent norm. For an apparent norm of small donations, eye images made many participants more generous than the norm. For an apparent norm of large donations, there was an excess of participants giving zero in the no-eyes treatment, which was abolished in the eyes treatment. Our results can be explained by a combination of watching eyes increasing prosocial motivation and reluctance to leave a donation visibly less generous than the norm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25331033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Psychol        ISSN: 1474-7049


  8 in total

1.  Eyes, More Than Other Facial Features, Enhance Real-World Donation Behavior.

Authors:  Caroline Kelsey; Amrisha Vaish; Tobias Grossmann
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2018-12

2.  It Depends Who Is Watching You: 3-D Agent Cues Increase Fairness.

Authors:  Jan Krátký; John J McGraw; Dimitris Xygalatas; Panagiotis Mitkidis; Paul Reddish
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Social Eavesdropping: Can You Hear the Emotionality in a "Hello" That Is Not Meant for You?

Authors:  Sethu Karthikeyan; Vijayachandra Ramachandra
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-03-08

4.  Sociality Mental Modes Modulate the Processing of Advice-Giving: An Event-Related Potentials Study.

Authors:  Jin Li; Youlong Zhan; Wei Fan; Lei Liu; Mei Li; Yu Sun; Yiping Zhong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-06

5.  Surveillance cues do not enhance altruistic behavior among anonymous strangers in the field.

Authors:  Erik J Koornneef; Aurelie Dariel; Iffat Elbarazi; Ahmed R Alsuwaidi; Paul B M Robben; Nikos Nikiforakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Butterfly Eyespots: Their Potential Influence on Aesthetic Preferences and Conservation Attitudes.

Authors:  Zoi Manesi; Paul A M Van Lange; Thomas V Pollet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Eye contact effects on social preference and face recognition in normal ageing and in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  D Lopis; M Baltazar; N Geronikola; V Beaucousin; L Conty
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-01

8.  Acute social and physical stress interact to influence social behavior: The role of social anxiety.

Authors:  Bernadette von Dawans; Amalie Trueg; Clemens Kirschbaum; Urs Fischbacher; Markus Heinrichs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.