Literature DB >> 25330990

Scribes in an Australian private emergency department: A description of physician productivity.

Katherine Walker1, Michael Ben-Meir, Phebe O'Mullane, David Phillips, Margaret Staples.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to determine if trained scribes in an Australian ED can assist emergency physicians (EPs) to work with increased productivity.
METHODS: This was a pilot, prospective, observational study conducted at a private ED in Melbourne. A scribe is a trained assistant who works with an EP and performs non-clinical tasks that reduce the time spent providing clinical care for patients. Shifts with and without a scribe were compared. The primary outcomes were patients per hour per doctor and billings per patient. Additional analyses included total patient time in ED; individual doctor productivity; time to see a doctor; time on ambulance bypass; and complaints/issues identified with scribes.
RESULTS: There was an overall increase in doctor consultations per hour of 0.32 patients (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17, 0.47). This varied between doctors from an increase in patients per hour of 0.16 (95% CI -0.09, 0.40) to 0.65 (95% CI 0.41, 0.89). Billings per patient were increased (AUD15.24; 95% CI -AUD18.51, AUD48.99), but the increase was not statistically significant; time to see a doctor reduced by 22 min (95% CI 11, 33); bypass episodes reduced by 66 min per shift (95% CI 11, 122), total patient ED stay remained constant.
CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, scribe usage was feasible, and overall improvements in consultations per hour were seen. Overall income improved by AUD104.86 (95% CI AUD38.52, AUD171.21) per scribed hour. Further study is recommended to determine if results are sustained or improved over a longer period.
© 2014 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  doctor's assistant; efficiency; emergency medicine; organisational; performance indicator; scribe

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25330990     DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med Australas        ISSN: 1742-6723            Impact factor:   2.151


  5 in total

1.  The 9-Item Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9) score is not useful in evaluating EMR (scribe) note quality in Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Katherine J Walker; Andrew Wang; William Dunlop; Hamish Rodda; Michael Ben-Meir; Margaret Staples
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  How does medical scribes' work inform development of speech-based clinical documentation technologies? A systematic review.

Authors:  Brian D Tran; Yunan Chen; Songzi Liu; Kai Zheng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Scribe Impacts on Provider Experience, Operations, and Teaching in an Academic Emergency Medicine Practice.

Authors:  Jeremy J Hess; Joshua Wallenstein; Jeremy D Ackerman; Murtaza Akhter; Douglas Ander; Matthew T Keadey; James P Capes
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-20

4.  Impact of scribes on emergency medicine doctors' productivity and patient throughput: multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Katherine Walker; Michael Ben-Meir; William Dunlop; Rachel Rosler; Adam West; Gabrielle O'Connor; Thomas Chan; Diana Badcock; Mark Putland; Kim Hansen; Carmel Crock; Danny Liew; David Taylor; Margaret Staples
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-01-30

5.  Teasing out Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: An Ethical Critique of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Mark Henderson Arnold
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.216

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.